Talk:Garbharakshambigai Temple

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Garbharakshambigai Temple article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

India: Tamil Nadu Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Tamil Nadu (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in August 2021.

Hinduism: Shaivism Low‑importance

	Hinduism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hinduism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Hinduism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HinduismWikipedia:WikiProject HinduismTemplate:WikiProject HinduismHinduism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Shaivism task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Architecture

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Legend section is wrong

The 'Legend' column informs contents which are not connected with this temple. The authenticated history of this temple can be seen from this temple website www.garbaratchambigaitemple.org and this temple history book published by our temple. Viewers are requested to get authenticated information from authenticated sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by EO, temple (talk • contribs) 03:12, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed that section. The reference given for it was page 22 of the book by Pillai. Do you know if the Pillai book actually contains the story that you say is incorrect? Looie496 (talk) 06:14, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The book by Pillai is the official temple book published earlier. I see a couple of "official" websites and there are quite some fights in other forums as well. Now which is the official website? The User:EO, temple has made promotional edits (i have reverted those) - such things also be avoided.Ssriram mt (talk) 12:06, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Garbharakshambigai temple. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130518021412/http://www.thanjavur.tn.nic.in/whattoseetou.html to http://www.thanjavur.tn.nic.in/whattoseetou.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:29, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]