Talk:Geofence

This page was proposed for deletion by RHaworth (talk · contribs) on 25 January 2009 with the comment:
neologism
It was contested by Phil Bridger (talk · contribs) with the comment:
having a neologism for a title is not a reason for deletion, and basic searches show obvious notability

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Computing: Security Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Computing, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of computers, computing, and information technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComputingWikipedia:WikiProject ComputingTemplate:WikiProject ComputingComputing articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by WikiProject Computer Security (assessed as Mid-importance).

Things you can help WikiProject Computer Security with:

Article alerts will be generated shortly by AAlertBot. Please allow some days for processing. More information...

Review importance and quality of existing articles
Identify categories related to Computer Security
Tag related articles
Identify articles for creation (see also: Article requests)
Identify articles for improvement
Create the Project Navigation Box including lists of adopted articles, requested articles, reviewed articles, etc.
Find editors who have shown interest in this subject and ask them to take a look here.

Technology

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Technology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of technology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.TechnologyWikipedia:WikiProject TechnologyTemplate:WikiProject TechnologyTechnology articles

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Business

	Business portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Business, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of business articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BusinessWikipedia:WikiProject BusinessTemplate:WikiProject BusinessWikiProject Business articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

On 22 July 2024, it was proposed that this article be moved from Geo-fence to Geofence. The result of the discussion was moved.

Inaccurate term?

The most common use of this term is "geo-fence" not "geofence." This article uses erroneous nomenclature. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 63.226.104.225 (talk) 16:58, 11 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What is the source for this "most common" claim and that "geofencing" is erroneous nomenclature? Testing this claim using Google shows that "geofencing" is more common for Google Search, Google News and Google Books. Only Google Scholar shows a slight edge for "geo fencing". I can't see how the single-word versions are erroneous nomenclature. Note that result counts for the two-word versions are not as reliable as they are based on the intersections of the individual words.^[1]

Term	Google Search	Google News	Google Books	Google Scholar	Citations
"geofencing"	2,020,000	11,800	781	1,320	^{search news books scholar}
"geo fencing"	330,000	2,160	538	1,760	^{search news books scholar}
"geofence"	370,000	1,640	372	1,280	^{search news books scholar}
"geo fence"	356,000	900	312	1,150	^{search news books scholar}

--Marc Kupper|talk 22:43, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am ready to edit the article to change all instances of "geo-fence" to "geofence". This word has been quite common in civil engineering - especially GIS-related - for over 2 decades (Google Books will show you that). It is quite common in the English language to eventually drop the hyphen in a previously hyphenated word. For example, the word "ink-well" was broadly-adopted after 1840, peaked around 1900, and declined substantially through 1940. This is because the non-hyphenated "inkwell" took off after 1900, and continues to be the dominate spelling. With geofence, while both spellings have been increasing in usage since roughly 2000, "geofence" is quite dominant over "geo-fence". Having said all of that, I believe readers of this article could benefit from having a consistent representation of the word throughout rather than having every other word spelled differently.^[1]

Philbayer (talk) 00:48, 2 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

References

^ https://books.google.com/ngrams/graph

This article needs to be moved back to the correct title

It looks like it was started with the correct title, then the term in the article was changed to the wrong spelling (with the hyphen), then at some point someone moved the title to match the spelling in the article. Now that the spelling in the article has been changed, this term needs to be moved back to the correct spelling, geofence. Coolcaesar (talk) 13:55, 5 July 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I moved "content" back to Geofence and made Geo-fence a redirect. Not sure if this was the proper way to do it, but Move Page was not an option because the destination already existed. Cru121 (talk) 06:58, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Dear colleague. The "cut-and-paste" move creates multiple issues, see WP:CUTPASTE). Use procedures for "technical moves" in WP:MOVE. In my opinion, BTW, the proper title would be Geofencing. Викидим (talk) 19:45, 23 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 22 July 2024

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Moved as an uncontested request with minimal participation. If there is any objection within a reasonable time frame, please ask me to reopen the discussion; if I am not available, please ask at the technical requests page. (closed by non-admin page mover) Frost 06:05, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Geo-fence → Geofence – per previous ngram results and discussion. also possibility of using gerundive form instead (i.e., Geofencing) by suggestion of Ahecht. Tule-hog (talk) 23:01, 21 July 2024 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). Tule-hog (talk) 02:35, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see any reason not to move back to "Geofence". Vacosea (talk) 22:30, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

[1] ttps://books.google.com/ngrams/graph

[1]