Talk:G. I. Taylor

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from Talk:Geoffrey Ingram Taylor)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on G. I. Taylor. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:49, 9 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Related deletion discussion[edit]

Editors of this article may be interested in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/G. I. Taylor Professor of Fluid Mechanics, where a proposal to merge with this article has been made. Please leave your opinions there. —David Eppstein (talk) 19:28, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for posting this here; I got distracted, forgot and just now remembered. XOR'easter (talk) 20:06, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

One of the most notable scientists of the 20th Century[edit]

This description of him is the opinion of one of his students (not an unbiased observer) and perhaps a couple other people. I don't think it's true and should be deleted. As a physicist and amateur science historian, I can list many physicists more notable (Einstein, Dirac, Bohr, Heisenberg, Oppenheimer, Fermi, Curie, J. J. Thomson, Planck, Chadwick, Feynmann, Weinberg for example, and scads of equals. And in chemistry and other scientific fields there are more eminent ones, and many many equals. Being in the top 100 is not "one of the most notable". I'm going to wait a week for comments, then delete or change to "a notable". Dr.gregory.retzlaff (talk) 22:22, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]