Talk:Guess (company)

This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Fashion Mid‑importance

	Fashion portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Fashion, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Fashion on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FashionWikipedia:WikiProject FashionTemplate:WikiProject Fashionfashion articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

California: Los Angeles Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Greater Los Angeles portal This article is supported by Los Angeles area task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Brands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Brands, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of brands on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BrandsWikipedia:WikiProject BrandsTemplate:WikiProject BrandsBrands articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Changes

Moved from Guess? to Guess (clothing) for the reason that the question mark is no longer even used in their logo (only in their press releases) in addition to the article being written with the question mark, you are not sure where sentences begin and finish. Uploaded their current logo (without a quesiton mark). I left the offical style, GUESS? (in caps and with a question mark, at the top of the page). Epson291 03:14, 10 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Guess Girls

There should be a guess girls template in chronological order.--TonyTheTiger (t/c/bio/WP:CHICAGO/WP:LOTD) 21:47, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article rated B-Class?

What substantiates this? It's poorly written, uses considerable peacock language, includes a long list of red-linked models, quotes uncited rumors, has a broken photo link, contains considerable original research. What about this article is commendable?

Piano non troppo (talk) 04:23, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Guess

"Luxury Fashion" brand?

They sell it at like sears and target, I think it's gone waaay downhill.

72.174.31.77 (talk) 08:45, 19 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Terrible Article

This article is a train wreck, and it reads like it was written by a non-native English speaker. Wuapinmon (talk) 02:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Dear, @Wuapinmon, Give me a constructive argument, to understand you better, as that doesn't help me much. 177.105.90.20 (talk) 21:04, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, friend. I don't recall what I'd said from 13 years ago. I'll see if my comment still applies and offer a better argument compared to not offering anything in my prior critique. Wuapinmon (talk) 23:47, 13 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Guess (clothing). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Corrected formatting/usage for http://www.ratm.com/new2/timeline/index.html
Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120321183508/http://www.skmoda.sk/hodinky/guess-hodinky.html to http://www.skmoda.sk/hodinky/guess-hodinky.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 09:48, 21 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]