Jump to content

Talk:Haris Silajdžić

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

grammatical article error (you can't say "a major figure", but "the major figure". Silajdžić can't, however, be stated to be "the major figure in Bosnian politics", but can be only said to be e.g. "one of main figures..." (which I put)).

major faults in politics subjectivity and false statements

[edit]

Corrected two false statements about Hague verdict and put references to bbc about the theme, and removed a false statement about war in Bosnia being "led by Serbs". Also some syntax errors, as well as quotes around some not proved accusations. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 212.200.83.2 (talk) 23:12, 16 April 2007 (UTC).[reply]

In fact, Serbs dominate the politics of Bosnia (where they’re the minority) because Bosnia is not a real electoral democracy, as we can see in Freedom House map. The formula of Dayton made the Republika Srpska a vetoing power in any decision the Bosnian government would make, forcing the FBiH to always choose the path of compromise, which is always the path of Serb demands.
Nowadays, even the premier of Bosnia is a Serb, though in general deocratic elections Serbs wouldn’t have any chance of having any real power. Bosnia-Herzegovina today is not a democracy, is a compromise-made headless country where Srpska play the cards, aided by Belgrade.
And the West don’t do anything concrete about this because it wants to appease Serbia and Russia.
Republika Srpska should be unitied with Serbia, then both sides (Muslims and Serbs) can govern themselves without interfering with one another. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.117.107.220 (talk) 12:24, 1 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]
To create a Republika Srpska inside the borders of Bosnia with the intention to annex it to Serbia is Greater Serbian nationalist ideology — the same idology professed by the master war criminals of the 1991-1999 Yugoslav Wars Slobodan Milosevic, Zeljko Raznatovic, Ratko Mladic and Radovan Karadzic. Haris Silajdzic is quite right in his assertions over the current Bosnian situation.

Mistake

[edit]
  • The article says that the International Court of Justice cleared Serbia of military aggression on Bosnia-Herzegovina during the 1992-1995 war etc. This is not true, since the ICJ does not have the jurisdiction to say that there was an aggression or not (it is not even recognized as a war crime), thus ICJ could never state that. Therefore, this is not correct. What Court said however was that the Sebia was not guilty for the genocide in Srebrenica. --Harac 15:22, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Ok, sorry about my edit summary. I've proposed a compromise - what do you think?--Hadžija 17:29, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Its fine, although I would say "genocide" instead of "massacre", because you put it in the same sentence with ICJ who defined it like that, plus the article that you refer to also says genocide --Harac 11:59, 20 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:StrankaZABiH.jpg

[edit]

Image:StrankaZABiH.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 05:22, 3 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:StrankaZABiH.jpg

[edit]

Image:StrankaZABiH.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 04:43, 14 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillic

[edit]

Is Serbian Cyrillic necessary? -- Haris Silajdžić isn't Serbian nor was he born in Serbia. The Cyrillic translation was just added on 8th February 2013... I nominate it to be taken off his wiki. --DemirBajraktarevic (talk) 20:43, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cyrillic is an official script in Bosnian language. I do not suppose Silajdžić speaks Croatian. Surtsicna (talk) 20:48, 9 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Haris Silajdžić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 08:38, 16 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Haris Silajdžić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:39, 30 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Haris Silajdžić. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:04, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]