Talk:Harpe brothers

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Untitled[edit]

This article needs to be rewritten in an encyclopedic style. User:Zoe|(talk) 07:02, 26 November 2005 (UTC)

I tried a few weeeks ago, but perhaps much more needs to be done. Эйрон Кинни 05:53, 15 February 2006 (UTC)

They were also accused of murdering a man named Johnson, whose body was found in a river, covered in urine, ripped open and weighted with stones. I'm skeptical of the assertion that a weighted-down body found in a river could be 'covered in urine'. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.118.171.219 (talk) 00:07, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Harpe brothers. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 06:15, 16 January 2018 (UTC)

Expansion[edit]

Considering the level of importance of this article (which is, unfortunately, like many SK articles) it's surprising the lack of development of this article. Most of the information in the article is poorly written and unsourced, as well as a complete lack of important information on the background of the area at the time, list of victims, and modus operandi. The article also contains way too many images that should be only included when appropriate. In essence, it should really be rewritten and restructured properly to fit Wikipiedia's guidelines and standards. If there is more detailed information on what is already listed in the article then it should be added with proper citations from reliable sources. The amount of information available on the Harpe Brothers would make this a prime candidate for GA and FA status if enough attention was given to it. Let's hope that happens.--Paleface Jack (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2019 (UTC)