Talk:Heart (EP)

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Heart (EP) redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Albums

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Norway

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Norway, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Norway on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.NorwayWikipedia:WikiProject NorwayTemplate:WikiProject NorwayNorway articles

Requested move[edit]

♥ (Heart) (Savant album) → ? – This should be moved to either ♥ (Heart) or ♥ (album)/♥ (Savant album) (all of these currently redirect here), depending on what the exact name of the album is (it's either ♥ or ♥ (Heart)), which I'm not certain of. Either way, the present title is way too long for no good reason. Please help me decide on the new name so that it can be moved. --MASHAUNIX 19:22, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comment. It should be moved to Heart (Savant album) per MOS:TM. Zarcadia (talk) 22:39, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Question - Does this even meet WP:NALBUMS?--Yaksar (let's chat) 22:42, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - It should be moved to Heart (Savant album) per MOS:TM as User:Zarcadia In ictu oculi (talk) 22:56, 4 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Move to Heart (Savant album) obviously. --George Ho (talk) 06:22, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Removing move template, as this has already been moved by the nominator to the title suggested by the respondents. Dekimasuよ! 20:30, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, I was any hurry when I moved it so I didn't have time to come here afterwards.--MASHAUNIX 21:29, 5 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Date format[edit]

@Emeraude: I'm confused about what you're saying on keeping the date format consistent, as only one source in this article that uses a date. How could this possible be more consistent than the previous rendering? I personally prefer the year-month-day format, which was why I contest a change away from that format if it seems without reason. ~Mable (chat) 11:52, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Maplestrip: The full day-month-year format appears in the second sentence ("It was released on 13 March 2013.") I was being consistent with the first use of a date. Emeraude (talk) 12:19, 24 March 2016 (UTC

Oh, in the article prose? Well, uhm, ok then, I guess... Seeing as there probably won't be any other sources for this article anyway, I suppose it doesn't matter much. ~Mable (chat) 12:22, 24 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]