Jump to content

Talk:Help (Papa Roach song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 7 October 2023

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: page not moved. Arbitrarily0 (talk) 20:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]


Help (Papa Roach song)Help (song) – No other song article by that title per WP:SONGDAB / Disambiguated from "Help!" (song) per WP:DIFFPUNCT JohnCWiesenthal (talk) 02:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC) This is a contested technical request (permalink). BegbertBiggs (talk) 18:09, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

This was under "Requests to revert undiscussed moves", but I see no previous undiscussed move. This also looks ambiguous with Help (Beatles song). —⁠ ⁠BarrelProof (talk) 03:17, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
In theory, the Beatles song is differentiated under WP:SMALLDETAILS since it includes an exclamation point in its title. However, SMALLDETAILS questions have historically been contentious, so I think this move would need to go through the full RM process. ModernDayTrilobite (talkcontribs) 13:59, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
"Help! (song)" distinguishes the Beatles song from this song, but "Help (song)" does not distinguish this song from the Beatles song. WP:SMALLDETAILS can be one-sided where, as here, only one of the titles is fully disambiguated in isolation (or a primary topic). SilverLocust 💬 12:56, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose - I created the article at its current location 6 years ago, but I think I just used this name because that was the redirect being used at the band's other articles. I don't really have strong feelings either way, but if I had to chose, I'd probably say keep it at its current location. The proposal is valid, but does leave room for misunderstandings. The current location doesn't. Sergecross73 msg me 18:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.