Jump to content

Talk:Holly Yashi

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Untitled

[edit]

This is a nationally and internationally recognized jewelry designer that has acquired significant notability. This entry does not "promote" their products, it merely states a set of verifiable facts about the organization. There is no difference between having an entry on this company/designer and any other company or designer. Ysgraithe (talk) 17:54, 9 February 2010 (UTC)Ysgraithe[reply]

User:Ysgraithe is correct, this article does not have a conflicting point of view. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.26.81.197 (talk) 21:29, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Holly Yashi. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:56, 30 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Could be more notable

[edit]

I think it is just a matter of the artist communicating to the rest of the world what they have actually done. The designs and jewelry are beautiful, and we can tell they are popular pieces of jewelry for sale in lots of places, but we need to know more than sales to rise to notability. These designs in this material are clearly unique. They use a unique alloy metal that is new to jewelry making. But we don't know anything about that from the article or website. The designs are nature-based, is that important? We need to know why they are featured in Woman's Circle Magazine or the Swarovski catalog. How does the designer relate her designs to the materials and what are the the inspirations for the designs? Currently the emphasis is on the business side, which is something, but it's not notable. The artist could easily provide indisputable evidence of notability by a published interview or a review in a news article, jewelry, art or design journal. Consider the example of another jewelry making material such as jade or silver. If Holly Yashi were selling Jade designer jewelry, there would be a discussion of the Jade, where it's from, how it's produced, and how the artist works with the materials for the designs, how feedback from their clientele is taken into account to make the designs, or whatever is important, and that could be in the articles cited here. Lilaponi (talk) 17:52, 10 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]