Jump to content

Talk:Horrible Histories

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Move?

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. No support here for the revert. DrKiernan (talk) 18:43, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Horrible HistoriesHorrible Histories (franchise)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The comments under "Historical accuracy" don't seem to be really about the accuracy of the show, but more about whether it's good educational material, or even good. And why do we have the opinions of a politician who's never even seen the program?125.230.97.217 (talk) 05:53, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Horrible Histories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 03:06, 5 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Horrible Histories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:54, 6 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Horrible Histories. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:17, 12 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Spin offs

[edit]

The "Boring Bible" book series is listed as a spin-off in the footer to the Horrible Histories page. But as far as I can see the Boring Bible series is merely inspired by the Horrible... series; different publishers and authors trying to use the same format/concept for a different subject. They're not in any official way related, unlike the Science and Geography series which are all published by Scholastic and more obviously direct spin offs. Much of the Boring Bible page has been written or edited by the author of the books himself. Does the Boring Bible link actually belong in this footer? Edit: After reflection and further research, I've removed the Boring Bible link. Every other spin off book series listed here is published by Scholastic and directly linked to Horrible Histories.

Box in the article is spoiling the alignment of the text

[edit]

In my opinion, something should be done about the box with text in it in the article as it is affecting the alignment of the text within the article, making the article look unprofessional in my opinion. Xboxsponge15 (talk) 12:37, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The box contained an extended quotation from a newspaper which I assessed as a copyright violation, so I removed it. Verbcatcher (talk) 19:36, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]