Jump to content

Talk:I've Got Nothing

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleI've Got Nothing has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starI've Got Nothing is part of the Chartjackers series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
January 2, 2011Good article nomineeListed
February 19, 2011Peer reviewReviewed
April 24, 2012Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on November 15, 2010.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that the 2009 single "I've Got Nothing" was written entirely through crowdsourcing in 10 weeks?
Current status: Good article

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:I've Got Nothing/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Sayantan (talk|contribs) 01:14, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'll review this article as soon as possible.--Sayantan (talk|contribs) 01:35, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Check Against GA criteria

[edit]

I'll finish the check completely in next few days. Meanwhile editors please try to resolve the problems I'm stating. It'll help save our time.--Sayantan (talk|contribs) 16:51, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Well-written:
    2. (a) the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct
    (b) it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation
  2. Verifiable with no original research:
    3. (a) it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline
    (b) reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose)
    (c) it contains no original research
  3. Broad in its coverage:
    4. (a) it addresses the main aspects of the topic
    (b) it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style)
  4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each
  5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute
  6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio
    7. (a) media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content
    (b) media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions

Review and comments

[edit]

This article is almost ready to be a GA. Just some small issues we need to take care before I pass it to GA status.

Lead

[edit]

Green tickY

Background and writing

[edit]
  • Chartjackers There is already a link for this on the lead. Remove this and all other repetition of links (eg. Miranda Chartrand in both lead and this section).
 Done
  • The name of the guy(s) (who patched up the song from 4000 comments) is nowhere mentioned.
plus Added
  • Dark's composition was inspired by "Strawberry Swing" by British band Coldplay and drew heavily from that song's chords. Give proper source.
 Fixed I can't find a decent source for that info, so I've just removed it.

Recording and release

[edit]
  • I saw in iTunes the single costs $0.99. Mention this price.
plus Added
  • The deduction by iTunes is not sourced.
 Fixed Removed.

Reception

[edit]
  • File:I'veGotNothing.ogg--The general rule of an audio-sample of a non-free song is to upload a sample of length 10% of the original song's length or 30s, whichever is shorter. Therefore an audio-sample of a song of length 2:50 (ie. 230 seconds) should not exceed 23s threshold. The present sample is of 26s. Also, I don't think the "Non-free media use rationale for Miranda Chartrand" is not necessary.
 Fixed I've uploaded a new version of the file that conforms to the 10% rule. I'd have thought that the named rationale for the Miranda Chartrand article would be necessary - it's a fair use file, so surely every article that displays it needs its own non-free media use rationale?

Music video

[edit]

Green tickY

Live performances

[edit]

Green tickY

Thank you very much for reviewing this article, Sayantan! VoBEDD (talk) 19:15, 1 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
One thing I forgot to mention is the sentence "Over the next 18 seconds of the song, 11 different sets of 35 viewers... " (in the section "Music video") doesn't look very nice to me. Is it 35 users in total 11 sets or 35 users in each of the 11 sets? Anyway, fix that and congratulation, it's a GA now. Very good job. --Sayantan (talk|contribs) 03:59, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you very much, Sayantan, that's brilliant! I've added a brief parenthetical remark to the article that I hope makes it clearer than it was 35 different users in each of the 11 sets. Thanks again! VoBEDD (talk) 09:33, 2 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Composition

[edit]

I think this article would benefit from a section about the composition of the song. I'd write one myself, but I know pretty much nothing about music. I've been able to unearth the chords, which are as follows:

Verse: G/D C/G G/D C/G
Interlude: Am Em Am Em C/G D/A
Chorus: G D F C
Refrain: D/A C/G D/A

(See ref: Dark, Jonny (17 September 2009). "Re: Melodies Week - ChartJackers". YouTube. Archived from the original on 11 February 2011. Retrieved 11 February 2011.)

But that means absolutely nothing to me. So, if someone else is able to write a pragraph or two about the song's composition, that'd be awesome. Thanks. VoBEDD (talk) 14:46, 11 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 18 external links on I've Got Nothing. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:00, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:I%27ve_Got_Nothing&oldid=1206400306"