Talk:Imelda (film)

Imelda (film) has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 13, 2014	Good article nominee	Listed
March 17, 2014	Featured article candidate	Not promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on February 9, 2014.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Imelda Marcos (pictured) claimed in the film Imelda that her extravagant clothing "inspired the poor to dress better"?

Current status: Good article

Film: Documentary / Southeast Asian

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.
	This article is supported by the Southeast Asian cinema task force.
	This article needs an image (preferably free) related to the subject, such as a picture of the set or a film poster. Please ensure that non-free content guidelines are properly observed.

Tambayan Philippines Mid‑importance

	Philippines portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Tambayan Philippines, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to the Philippines on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Tambayan PhilippinesWikipedia:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesTemplate:WikiProject Tambayan PhilippinesPhilippine-related articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Imelda (film)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 16:47, 7 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Lead is weak, it doesn't describe the film really at all, and heads straight for reviewers' comments.
" $200,000 at the US box office with an additional US$300,000" you link the second US$ but just have an unlinked $ the first time.
"It holds very favourable" It received...
You link Marcos but not First Lady in the lead but then you link First Lady and not Marcos in the opening paragraph of the Synopsis section.
"her whirlwind romance" reads like a tabloid.
We have an article on Human rights in the Philippines you could link to.
"met Douglas MacArthur during" perhaps just add "General" in here so we can better put this meeting into context.
"why she got the lyrics wrong" -> "why she sang the lyrics incorrectly"
"Imelda in 2006." any reason why this shouldn't be "Marcos in 2006"?
"The film had its world premiere" ->" The film's world premiere..."
"and had its North American premiere" ->"while its North American premiere was..."
"within Maryland Film " -> "at the Maryland..."
Our article on Film Threat italicises the title.
"San Francisco Chronicle said " -> "The San Francisco Chronicle said "
It appears that Spiderman 2 is actually called "Spider-Man 2".
References could use filling out, e.g. adding retrieval dates and publication dates where appropriate, see WP:CITESTYLE.
"Comedy film" is a category, is this serious?

A few issues, so this is on hold for a week. The Rambling Man (talk) 10:33, 9 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed most of them.--♥ 14:53, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

When do you plan to fix the rest of them? The Rambling Man (talk) 14:59, 11 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

*Actually, I have fixed all of them. the only thing I disagree with is using her last name versus her first. The use of her first name is widely used in many publications and I think that's fine based on mononym, Leonardo da Vinci, and WP:PRIMARYTOPIC.--♥^(Theparties) 09:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

&Fine. I'll fix it.--♥^(Theparties) 09:52, 13 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]