|This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to . If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.|
|This article is of interest to the following WikiProjects:|
The notice above about Biographies of Living People is part of Wikipedia policy. It took me one second to find something positive about John Burris on the web, and it turns out this little itty bitty non-negative thing was in some of the articles used to fill this BLP. For some reason this article is heavily weighted towards the negative about Burris. Try to at least pretend it's an article about the man not against the man. --KP Botany (talk) 13:05, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- There were lots of positive things in the bio. I have no objection to the addition. THF (talk) 13:14, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
Nationality, and which particular State, is encyclopedic information
I am concerned that it is considered that Oakland only is considered sufficient information for determining the location of a subject. This isn't the California encyclopedia, nor even the North American version, but the English speaking Encyclopedia - and as long as I am compelled to note that Truro is a city within Cornwall, England, United Kingdom (as everyone around where I live knows!) I see no reason why the full address (city, state and nation) should not be used in US based articles. For one thing, such information aids the Google and other search functions. LessHeard vanU (talk) 14:09, 8 February 2009 (UTC)
- It's been corrected, hopefully by you. Also one of my pet peeves, even when it's a city I live in. --KP Botany (talk) 02:56, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
A user just added a disclaimer to the article to the effect that the State of California doesn't specifically recognize Mr. Burris' "specialty." I don't think it was implied that they did, it was merely a statement of the fact that this is the kind of case this guy specializes in, so I removed the disclaimer. It also seems like a deliberate attempt to discredit Mr. Burris, so is a POV problem as well. Beeblebrox (talk) 01:50, 9 February 2009 (UTC)
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 2 external links on John Burris. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090512111221/http://calbar.ca.gov/calbar/2cbj/96oct/art6.htm to http://www.calbar.ca.gov/calbar/2cbj/96oct/art6.htm
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140108053217/http://www.dailyjournal.com/cle/print.cfm?eid=902582&evid=1 to http://www.dailyjournal.com/cle/print.cfm?eid=902582&evid=1
|checked=, on this template, to true or failed to let other editors know you reviewed the change. If you find any errors, please use the tools below to fix them or call an editor by setting
|needhelp= to your help request.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
|needhelp=<your help request> on this template to request help from an experienced user. Please include details about your problem, to help other editors.