||This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.
If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.
- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: No consensus to move — Amakuru (talk) 15:52, 9 September 2016 (UTC)
– The two Josh Kennedys were originally disambiguated by initial, until they were moved to their current titles in September 2014, with the explanation that they were "not known by initial" . This is inaccurate, as the AFL's website (and all other football media as far as I'm aware) distinguish the players based on their initials. (Disambiguation by team would be non-standard and is not really an option, given that both players have played for multiple teams). Initials are far more recognisable to the reader than date of birth, and disambiguation by initials is already used for other VFL/AFL players (e.g. the two Graeme Andersons, the two George Chapmans, and the two Arthur Edwardses). IgnorantArmies (talk) 11:13, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Though I don't think the other players is relevant, The two Josh Kennedy are definitely disambiguated by initial in the media and by fans. --SuperJew (talk) 11:29, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose I'd rather keep article naming convention consistent, and the practice of disambiguation by initials is an old practice that we've been moving away from. No problem with having Josh J and Josh P as redirects. Aspirex (talk) 11:57, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose Agree with Aspirex, disambiguate by initial is really a last resort in the guidelines of the project and the project has made a strong move to move away from these types of dabs. I don't know if many people in the public would refer to them as Josh P. Kennedy and Josh J. Kennedy anyway, and if that was their search term then having it as a redirect is appropriate (which I think it currently is anyway). Flickerd (talk) 12:10, 1 September 2016 (UTC)
- Oppose We've flipped/flopped enough on these, stick with the by year style. Neither option is ideal for everyone, but the by year can at least be standardised across all duplicate named players (like the Mitch Browns, Nathan Browns and Scott Thompsons. (and slowly convert most of the old middle initial letter style ones to born ones). The-Pope (talk) 03:47, 3 September 2016 (UTC)
- Support Fuck yeah :D — Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.127.116.11 (talk • contribs) 05:01, 6 September 2016 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.