Talk:KXTV

California Low‑importance

	California portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject California, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of California on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CaliforniaWikipedia:WikiProject CaliforniaTemplate:WikiProject CaliforniaCalifornia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Other network pre-emptions

IIRC,during its CBS days,the station also preempted other lower rated network programs even before banishing Guiding Light: the entire late night lineup from the late 1980's until the arrival of The Late Show with David Letterman as well as the entire 9-10am weekday block from at least the mid-1980's until the network cancelled it outright in the early 1990's...

Additionally, once it picked up the current ABC affiliation, it did not pick up the half-hour soap that aired either during the 11am or noon hour(first Loving/The City, then Port Charles); but that became a moot point once the network eliminated that programming block outright...Ranma9617 07:03, 11 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Past Personalities

I changed all the descriptions as "who knows" to the more-encyclopediadic "unknown". WAVY 10 18:51, 30 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:KXTV.PNG

Image:KXTV.PNG is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:20, 5 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

More freelancers?

Though he hasn't a bio on the official homepage, Harry Stockman(this station's one-time chief meteorologist from the 80's)has filled in occasionally as of late. Additinally, Jon Baird (one time at KOVR) has been used as a reporter. Are they freelance? Ranma9617 04:49, 13 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use criteria

The use of images not in compliance with our fair-use criteria or our policy on nonfree content is not appropriate, and the images have been removed. Please do not restore them. — Moe ε 21:03, 30 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Present Personalities

What about Jennifer Smith? Sharon Ito? Krusty49er (talk) 21:30, 13 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Cinema Insomnia deletion discussion

Feel free to discuss the Category:Cinema Insomnia's nomination for deletion here: Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2010 September 10#Category:Cinema Insomnia.--DrWho42 (talk) 10:44, 17 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WP:LISTPEOPLE

The names being restored do not meet the requirements given at WP:LISTPEOPLE, and the entries should not include external links per WP:EL. The Wikipedia article should include a list of notable people, not just a list of people that happen to work here, per WP:DUE. - Aoidh (talk) (formerly User:SudoGhost) 01:45, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

- These lists are on TV station articles — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anthonyramos1 (talk • contribs)

Even if they are on some other articles, they shouldn't be. That is not reason to include these names. - Aoidh (talk) (formerly User:SudoGhost) 03:57, 21 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Then they should all be removed

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on KXTV. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Digital TV section

(mostly any ways) My edits of this article were indeed constructive, unlike those of Spshu. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:08, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you both keep it up, I'll go ahead and report you both. Don't edit the page until you work things out. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 00:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I have [pointed out] to Mvcg66b3r that my edits were discussed at the TVS wikiproject. Analog to digital per the discussion is a one time event and should be covered in history. Some other were simplification from using two characters "()" to a single ":". Other information that was removed was unsourced thus the onus was on him to sourced the information before it was returned. Spshu (talk) 00:19, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You would have to change the format of almost every TV station article. And what information in my edits do you say is unsourced? Mvcg66b3r (talk) 00:25, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsourced were King World local rights and Sacramento Kings local rights. You are also removing sourced information about when the Justice Network launched on the channel. Spshu (talk) 00:40, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't write about King World or the Kings. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 01:09, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

But you are returning this unsourced information in your edit. Spshu (talk) 12:44, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Then we'll have to see who wrote the unsourced info, because it was there before I made my edits. Mvcg66b3r (talk) 12:50, 3 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]