Talk:Kachhua Sanctuary

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject India / Protected areas (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the Protected areas of India workgroup (marked as Mid-importance).
 
WikiProject Protected areas (Rated Stub-class, Low-importance)
WikiProject icon This article is part of WikiProject Protected areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected natural or ecological areas worldwide.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
 

Requested move 31 July 2016[edit]

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: No consensus. (non-admin closure) kennethaw88talk 02:45, 21 August 2016 (UTC)


Kachhua SanctuaryTortoise Sanctuary – English name -- Pankaj Jain Capankajsmilyo (talk · contribs · count) 03:34, 31 July 2016 (UTC) --Relisting. Anarchyte (work | talk) 00:52, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

  • Weak Oppose. While the name is English, and we have WP:ENGLISH, IAR, and I get the right information when performing a search for "Kachhua Sanctuary" rather than "Tortoise Sanctuary". The new title may have potential to be confused with a zoo exhibit. I suggest not moving for now, especially given the lack of participation, and closing "no consensus". — Andy W. (talk ·ctb) 02:37, 11 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Weak oppose – the proposed title seems highly ambiguous, as there are many places that would fit that topic name. —BarrelProof (talk) 18:47, 14 August 2016 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.