Talk:Kathleen Unger

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[Untitled][edit]

Please note that I’m not related to Kathleen Unger, nor do I have any professional dealings with her. The “appearance” of a “close connection” with the subject is incorrect. Many Wikipedians have weighed-in, scrutinized and improved the article over the past three years. The article is notable, factual, objective, well-referenced, neutral and in compliance with wikipedia protocols. Obviously, we all welcome any specific improvements to this article. In the meantime, I am removing the two blanket tags that were placed without prior notice nearly a month ago. They drew no response from any Wikipedian. Momto2 (talk) 16:03, 21 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The mention within the article of multiple unreferenced personal pieces of information. Wikipuffery to persuade of its significance; article written like a résumé also stands a high chance of being autobiographical. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 204.15.29.147 (talk) 05:38, 20 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I am reverting the recent deletions and bogus calls for "citations needed" as they are clearly a case of vandalism and defamation designed to denigrate a non-partisan, non-profit organization. The timing of aforesaid activities occurred suspiciously in the latter half of December -precisely at the time when a 501(c)(3) non profit is most reliant on public donations. The nefarious edits were not in keeping with Wikipedia policy and an affront to any sense of neutrality. On the contrary, the specious allegations were a transparent attempt to damage VoteRiders and its Founder.(Momto2 (talk) 18:48, 1 January 2017 (UTC))

The unsigned comment above does not cite any examples of Wikipuffery, nor can I find any. I don't see any reason to keep the COI tag on this page. My only other suggestion would be to merge the "Election Integrity" and "Political/Non-profit" sections into the "Professional Career" subheading, or at least to separate all mentions of VoteRiders into its own section, as she appears to be most affiliated with that non-profit. User:Sidney Stencil 01:15, 14 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The content doesn’t seem to be in violation of the COI protocols for sourcing and objectivity, so I removed the COI tag. User:Sidney Stencil 18:54, 15 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kathleen Unger. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:24, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]