Talk:Kimberley Joseph

Kimberley Joseph was one of the Media and drama good articles, but it has been removed from the list. There are suggestions below for improving the article to meet the good article criteria. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 24, 2009	Good article nominee	Listed
September 9, 2024	Good article reassessment	Delisted

Current status: Delisted good article

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Arts and Entertainment

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.

Australia: Television Low‑importance

	Australia portal Kimberley Joseph is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian television (assessed as Low-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Liked by the Lost producers

I realise that I chopped out a rather large section on her Lost appearances the other day (and obviously got the chronology of her appearances mixed up) but I thought the bit about her speaking the first lines of the series was a little trivial and I couldn't find anything to verify that "she was liked by the producers so much that she was kept alive". Was this mentioned on a DVD commentary or behind the scenes clip or just in an interview that I haven't been able to find? Also, could someone put something in to show "The Other 48 Days" was critically acclaimed please (I don't watch Lost in case you can't tell. :) ). WindsorFan 16:10, 19 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Clean up neeeded

Joanne Brennan guest spots in Hercules: The Legendary Journeys. What is menat by this sentence fragment? 08:09, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Photographer

This person is listed as an Australian photographer, but there are no links in this article to demonstrate that she has notability as a photographer. For this reason I am removing her from the Australian Photographers catagory. If you provide some evidence as to why she is a photographer then please feel free to re-add her to the category. Jenafalt (talk) 20:29, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

She has had photographs printed in a widely-published book and had them displayed at a non-trivial exhibition. While photography is not her main claim to fame, she is more than just an amateur who puts a few snaps of flowers on Flickr. Bradley0110 (talk) 19:02, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your response. I am tidying up the Australian Photographers category and she does not have as much notability as a photographer as others in this category. Jenafalt (talk) 19:44, 3 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Kimberley Joseph/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Overall the article is good, however I have the following concerns:

Ref #13 is a deadlink.
"The short-lived soap was on Australian screens for 15 months before being cancelled, but Joseph gained experience and friendships with Raelee Hill, Megan Connolly, and Isla Fisher." This sentence doesn't flow right to me with the rest of the paragraph. Not sure how to fix it, it just seems weird.
Never been a fan of using "as of 200x" in articles. Reword it.
The prose in general could use some fine-tuning.

I'll put it on hold and double-check the article upon completion. Wizardman 22:07, 22 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I think I've got everything now. Bradley0110 (talk) 10:32, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Everything looks good now, so I'll pass the article. Wizardman 14:33, 24 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Ref 7

There is an online archive link for ref number 7 at [1].RAIN*the*ONE ^BAM 03:23, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added, thanks. Bradley0110 (talk) 20:46, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 5 external links on Kimberley Joseph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:50, 6 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Kimberley Joseph. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100119210445/http://www.abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=011510_05 to http://www.abcmedianet.com/web/dnr/dispDNR.aspx?id=011510_05

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 14:29, 10 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

GA Reassessment

Kimberley Joseph

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch • Watch article reassessment page • Most recent review

Result: Delisted. Hog Farm _Talk 00:54, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It may be outdated from when it achieved good article status in 2009. Contains a number of uncited statements plus as a good article biography would need an image of the subject. LibStar (talk) 14:14, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.