Talk:L&L Energy

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany articles

Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Energy

	Energy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Energy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Energy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnergyWikipedia:WikiProject EnergyTemplate:WikiProject Energyenergy articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

China

	China portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject China, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of China related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChinaWikipedia:WikiProject ChinaTemplate:WikiProject ChinaChina-related articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

United States

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because articles about the company have been published by respectable, independent, specialized sources such as the Wall Street Journal, Fool.com and Seekingalpha.com http://online.wsj.com/article/BT-CO-20120130-704736.html http://seekingalpha.com/symbol/llen http://www.fool.com/quote/nasdaq/l-l-international-holdings-inc/llen --Itemirus (talk) 15:52, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The WSJ thing looks like a press release to me and the others don't seem to be reliable sources (and even if they are, this is not in-depth coverage). Given that you seem to have been around for a while, how come you create stubs without any claim to notability and no independent reliable sources? --Randykitty (talk) 16:15, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

In my humble opinion, all the companies listed on the two major American stock exchanges (NYSE and Nasdaq) deserve an article just for being listed there; said that, the company has been the subject of independent articles on notable specialized websites. I admit I've been too hasty in writing the article but a stub is just that, a brief description. A Google search for L&L Energy yields thousand of results.--Itemirus (talk) 16:27, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I get four hits on a news search for this company. That's good enough for CSD. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 16:57, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

SEC case makes L&L more interesting=

https://www.sec.gov/litigation/admin/2014/33-9565.pdf

This action arises out of a fraudulent scheme by L&L Energy and Dickson Lee to create the appearance that L&L was run by a professional management team and conceal Lee’s single-handed control of the company. L&L Energy is a Seattle-headquartered coal company with all of its operations in China and Taiwan. 203.186.110.162 (talk) 04:44, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]