Talk:Langham Hotel, London

This article was nominated for deletion on 15 June 2007. The result of the discussion was keep.

London Low‑importance

	London portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Travel and Tourism: Hotels Low‑importance

	Society portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Travel and Tourism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of travel and tourism related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Travel and TourismWikipedia:WikiProject Travel and TourismTemplate:WikiProject Travel and TourismTourism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Hotels.

Architecture Low‑importance

	Architecture portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

BBC Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject BBC, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the BBC. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join us as a member. You can also visit the BBC Portal.BBCWikipedia:WikiProject BBCTemplate:WikiProject BBCBBC articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tasks for WikiProject BBC:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Improve BBC, BBC News (TV channel) and BBC News to Good Article status following previous reviews, create BBC Computer Literacy Project (in light of forthcoming 30th anniversary)
Cleanup : Chucklevision - references and general clean-up, Pebble Mill Studios - over-detailed and long, BBC World Service Television - unreferenced and confusing
Copyedit : BBC News, Broadcasting House
Expand : Top 20 start-class BBC articles with most importance: BBC Japan, BBC World Service Television, BBC Lifestyle, BBC Two Northern Ireland
NPOV : Criticism of the BBC (See comments)
Stubs : Stub-Class BBC articles
Other : *Restructure the category
- Add infoboxes to the BBC articles without infoboxes
- Add free-use images to biographical articles where possible
- Add references to Goa Mix (see assessment) and Coat of arms of the BBC
- Return Dad's Army to a Good article. (See comments)
- Reassess BBC following improvements to article.

Untitled

This is mostly historical information and barely contains any information about the hotel as it is today, and seeing that it was built in 1865, I feel like it's survived long enough to warrant a page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by LHinternational (talk • contribs)

Please also indicate, then, why it's notable citing reliable sources. Thanks. → AA ^{(talk • contribs)} — 10:52, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Um, why are you requesting speedy deletion when this article has existed since March 15, 2005? If you thought the edits by User:Lhinternational [1] were too commercial why didn't you just remove the excessive links that he added (which I just did)? Gustav von Humpelschmumpel 11:08, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The deletion tag is not completed correctly, please check and try again. This building has a long history, including much of its time spent in the ownership of the BBC. I would be enclined to keep it. Kbthompson 17:51, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It was one of a series of articles on Langham Hotels where the only source used was the hotel's own website and there appeared to be a COI concerning the main contributor, User:LHinternational (who incidentally no longer exists). It read like an advertisement, although admittedly, this article has more historical info than the other ones. It seems evident that the AfD will result in a keep so it would be useful to add a few secondary sources if anyone can find them since the article is still lacking in this area. → AA ^{(talk • contribs)} — 19:16, 19 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Langham Hotel, London. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120723090915/http://www.langhamhotels.com/pdf/lhi_history_lhi_en.pdf to http://www.langhamhotels.com/pdf/lhi_history_lhi_en.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:03, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]