Talk:Last Gasp (Inside No. 9)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Last Gasp (Inside No. 9)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Lemonade51 (talk · contribs) 17:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Happy to review this.

• "It first aired on 26 February 2014 on BBC2." Should that be BBC Two? Would wikilink it too.
• "Critics were generally unimpressed with the episode. Bruce Dessau, Gerard Gilbert (The Independent) and Jack Seale (Radio Times), though generally complimentary of Inside No. 9, considered "Last Gasp" to be weaker than the previous three episodes", bit repetitive?
• "The episode was written around the time of the death of Michael Jackson and the death of Amy Winehouse", hmmm, the source doesn't say it was written around that time. Rather the idea of the episode was conceived.
• Brilliant work on the lead. Perhaps you could remove overly descriptive bits like "Later, Graham makes tea for Jan and Sally." and "Tamsin, sitting in her wheelchair, holds the balloon."
• "The acting in the episode was praised by Michael Hogan and Rachel Ward, writing in the Daily Telegraph, who said that", maybe you could tighten the prose here? Something like "The acting in the episode was praised by Michael Hogan and Rachel Ward, who wrote in The Daily Telegraph, "[w]ith their gift for comedy, vulnerability and pathos, Tamsin Grieg and Sophie Thompson (sister of Emma) deliver excellent performances"?
• "Last Gasp" was selected as comedy 'pick of the day' in The Express," Daily Express you mean? When The Express is wikilinked, a film comes up.
• Ref 3 was published on theguardian.com, not The Guardian newspaper.
• Ref 11 should be The Daily Telegraph
• Newspaper sources need location parameter filled in; in other words -- Ref 1, 7, 8, 11, 12, 13 and 15 are all London, Ref 14 is Glasgow.

No dabs or dead links. References do check out and the three images have sufficent licenses. In all a nice read and shall pass once comments have been addressed. Lemonade51 (talk) 17:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi, thanks for the review. I've made the changes you suggested apart from two- I'd rather leave in the reference to Tamsin's wheelchair, as it keeps the reader in mind of her illness, which is an important part of the story, spawning a lot of rather dark jokes. I've also not added newspaper locations, as I feel that this is a legitimate difference in style; I've never listed newspaper locations, and, as far as I'm aware, there's nothing in the MOS which says that it's preferred. The general rule is that any citation style which might be used in academic work is acceptable, as long as there's consistency within the article. J Milburn (talk) 18:36, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

No problem, will pass. Lemonade51 (talk) 19:34, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the review, it's thoroughly appreciated. Some great catches in terms of mistakes I'd made- you clearly put in the effort. J Milburn (talk) 20:03, 5 March 2014 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Last Gasp (Inside No. 9). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140302081657/http://www.radiotimes.com/episode/cs5xcw/inside-no-9--series-1---4-last-gasp to http://www.radiotimes.com/episode/cs5xcw/inside-no-9--series-1---4-last-gasp

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:52, 30 September 2017 (UTC)