Talk:Latawnya, the Naughty Horse, Learns to Say "No" to Drugs
![]() | This article was nominated for deletion on 13 September 2017. The result of the discussion was no consensus. |
![]() | This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
I just wanted to thank everyone who supported me in making this a valid Wiki entry.
Rex1932 00:46, 6 September 2007 (UTC)
For making this a valid Wiki entry, I would like to thank Rex1932. "Thank you, Rex1932." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 207.191.85.179 (talk) 14:18, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Sources, citations, and NPOV
[edit]"Due to its absurd writing, illustrations and comments from the author, this book sells out almost anytime a copy becomes available on Amazon.com." The source doesn't seem very reputable, and the fact that the book sells out when a copy is available is neither explicitly stated in said source nor may it be true now, as the source was published in 2007. The use of the word "absurd" should also be backed up by a reputable source, as it does not constitute neutral point of view. Quotes from the book should come with citations.--Slice-of-insanity (talk) 02:10, 22 April 2012 (UTC)
Case query
[edit]The judgement http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/california/cacdce/5:2011cv00021/491638/142/0.pdf?1315636953 mentions defendants
- Pacific Lutherean University
- Amazon.com
- Urban Dictionary
while the complaint (http://www.scribd.com/doc/45079183/Gibson-v-Amazon-Complaint lists
- Amazon
- Urban Dictionary
- Wikipedia
Are these the same suit? If so when and why did the defendants change?
All the best, Rich Farmbrough, 19:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC).
- Although obviously the cases have some similarities, the case numbers are different, so it doesn't seem to be exactly the same case. I don't have information to know what happened to the first case and why a second case was filed. --Metropolitan90 (talk) 04:37, 13 September 2017 (UTC)