Jump to content

Talk:Lealholm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former good article nomineeLealholm was a Geography and places good articles nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There may be suggestions below for improving the article. Once these issues have been addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
June 30, 2008Good article nomineeNot listed

Classification

[edit]

Can we reclassify this article as better than start class? Maniac Pony (talk) 15:48, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Its in much better shape now than it was when I last rated it in August 2007, well done. I have added some pointers to the comments file as to where to go next with article if you are thinking of a GA nomination. Keith D (talk) 17:54, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Is Lealholm worth a reassessment from a B class??? Maniac Pony (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you think it is higher than a B then have a look at GA nominations and put it in for an assessment, though some people like to go for a Peer review first but it is not always that productive depends on getting a real review rather than the auto-one that is sometimes produced. Keith D (talk) 21:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A quick scan gives one thing that needs doing and that is the distances etc. need converting to metric - suggest using {{Convert}} e.g to convert 9 miles use {{Convert|9|mi|km|lk=on}} which will give 9 miles (14 km). Set lk=off for second and subsequent uses in a section to remove the wikilinks. Keith D (talk) 22:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Layout

[edit]

Any chance of adopting the standard WP:UKTOWNS layout? The quote at the top really ought to be amalgamated with the rest of the lead too! --Jza84 |  Talk  13:11, 3 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I made some changes with this diff. I hope it helps, --Jza84 |  Talk  15:40, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for doing the changes. I just did a few obvious things before I went on holiday as it had been nominated for GA. Keith D (talk) 23:25, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

GA Fail

[edit]

Please see find the GA talk page at Talk:Lealholm/GA1 -epicAdam (talk) 18:57, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Lealholm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 10:12, 18 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Assessment comment

[edit]

The comment(s) below were originally left at Talk:Lealholm/Comments, and are posted here for posterity. Following several discussions in past years, these subpages are now deprecated. The comments may be irrelevant or outdated; if so, please feel free to remove this section.

Comment(s)Press [show] to view →
.
  1. Add inline references using one of the {{Cite}} templates  Done
  2. Requires infobox  Done
  3. Requires restructuring into sections  Done

Keith D 21:30, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Maniac Pony (talk) 16:12, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  1. Expand on lead to summarise article, add North Yorkshire & England to give some context  Done
  2. Switch existing references to use one of the {{Cite}} templates  Done
  3. Make external link in text a reference  Done
  4. Select a suitable representative photo to put in infobox  Done
  5. May be get rid of the gallery & put at appropriate places in text, could fill in the white space to right of show details.  Done, but kept gallery for extra images.
  6. Complete westminster_constituency detail in infobox  Done
  7. Photographs of churches  Done, (although no pic of Chatholic church) would help that section as would indication if any are listed buildings
  8. Take a look at WP:UKCITIES for other ideas  Done, but will keep expanding where appropriate
  9. Copy-edit for WP:MOS - for example apostrophes in decades Ongoing

Keith D (talk) 17:47, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maniac Pony (talk) 17:10, 10 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Maniac Pony (talk) 18:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Last edited at 18:36, 13 March 2008 (UTC). Substituted at 21:45, 29 April 2016 (UTC)

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Lealholm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:39, 31 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 8 external links on Lealholm. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:34, 20 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Lealholm&oldid=1208121091"