Talk:Lindsey Doe

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
July 29, 2014	Articles for deletion	Deleted

This article must adhere to the biographies of living persons (BLP) policy, even if it is not a biography, because it contains material about living persons. Contentious material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately from the article and its talk page, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted, or if you have other concerns, please report the issue to this noticeboard.

If you are a subject of this article, or acting on behalf of one, and you need help, please see this help page.

Biography: Science and Academia

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
	This article is supported by the science and academia work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Sexology and sexuality Low‑importance

	Human sexuality portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sexology and sexuality, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of human sexuality on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Sexology and sexualityWikipedia:WikiProject Sexology and sexualityTemplate:WikiProject Sexology and sexualitySexology and sexuality articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Internet culture Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the YouTube Task Force.

WikiProject Internet culture To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : View all requested internet culture articles
Expand : Pick an article from here or here
Photo : Category:Internet culture articles needing images
Stubs : All stubs are located here
Other : Category:Internet self-classification codes (!?); Try to get YouTube to FA; Tag all articles you find with {{WikiProject Internet culture}}
- See also Category:Internet culture articles needing attention

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Previous deletion[edit]

The article for this person was previously deleted for failing to cite reliable sources. I have cited four articles from two publications which in my opinion pass WP:GNG. Blue Rasberry (talk) 03:08, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree. You've cited three articles from a small town free alternative weekly about a local figure, plus an article from a student newspaper at the university where she used to teach. In my opinion, that is inadequate sourcing to establish notability. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 03:51, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Cullen328 Perhaps the university newspaper fails WP:RS due to WP:COI. That leaves the newspaper, and I think it is fair to say that it is a small town free alternative weekly. Do you think that these fail WP:RS, or do they pass that and fail WP:GNG? In my opinion, small town papers are good sources for talking about local figures, so they pass RS. With the articles being on different topics, published by different writers, and published years apart, in my opinion that constitutes GNG. You might expect more, and if you do, we could talk here or at WP:AfD. Blue Rasberry (talk) 04:58, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment[edit]

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Bbaker2017.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 00:08, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

unsupported categorization[edit]

Wikipedia:Categorization says Categorization of articles must be verifiable. It should be clear from verifiable information in the article why it was placed in each of its categories. For this reason, I don't understand why Djodjo666 (talk · contribs) has twice ([1] & [2]) added Category:American expatriates in Slovenia without an edit summary, when the article says nothing about Doe's nationality or citizenship. I removed it once, pointing to the categorization guideline, but was silently reverted again without discussion. Can anybody else explain the edits of Djodjo666? — Fourthords | =Λ= | 12:32, 28 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]