Talk:List of bacon dishes

This article was nominated for deletion on 2 June 2009. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Food and drink, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of food and drink related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Food and drinkWikipedia:WikiProject Food and drinkTemplate:WikiProject Food and drinkFood and drink articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Related taskforces:
/
	This article is within the scope of the Bacon task force, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.

Food and Drink task list:

To edit this page, select here

Here are some tasks you can do for WikiProject Food and drink:

Help bring these Top Importance articles currently B Status or below up to GA status: Agaricus bisporus (i.e. mushroom), Beef, Bread, Curry, Drink, Food, Ham and eggs, Soy sauce, Sushi, Yogurt
Bring these Top Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Beer, French cuisine, Sugar
Bring these High Importance articles currently at GA status up to FA status: Apple, Burger King, Fish
Participate in project-related deletion discussions.
Delete unrelated trivia sections found in articles. Please review WP:Trivia and WP:Handling trivia to learn how to do this.
Add the {{WikiProject Food and drink}} project banner to food and drink related articles and content to help bring them to the attention of members. For a complete list of banners for WikiProject Food and drink and its child projects, select here.
Provide photographs and images for Category:Wikipedia requested images of food
Consider joining this project's Assessment task force. List any project ideas in this section

Note: These lists are transcluded from the project's tasks pages.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Comment

It would be nice to add some photos to this article of the dishes. I think the bacon photo can be dropped... ChildofMidnight (talk) 20:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I added the origin section, an image section a la list of cakes might work well here.--kelapstick (talk) 23:50, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

While it arguably looks better, do you think the difficulty formatting lists for novices could discourage "drive-by" expansion? Bongo matic 23:57, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps, although once I am finished I will separate it so that it is easier to add something by seeing how it is formatted. --kelapstick (talk) 17:49, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Bacon Salt/Baconaisse

I've removed these two products from the listing as both only contain bacon 'flavouring' (not real bacon) and are actually certified Kosher! http://www.jdfoods.net/images/shop/nutrition-original.gif Obscurasky (talk) 13:51, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of sourced info

[1] = Obscurasky (talk · contribs) removed a good deal of sourced info, replacing it with completely unsourced info. The edits by Wackywace (talk · contribs) were helpful, positive, and improvements to the page. Please do not do this again. Thank you, -- Cirt (talk) 21:53, 19 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sources/citations were not the reason I reverted Wackywace (talk · contribs)'s edits. The information he added is just way too detailed. This page is a list of bacon dishes and only a brief description is necessary. A link to each dish is included in the table if readers require more detailed information.

The article, as it stands, lacks continuity; not only with regard to the balance of information, but also because you've altered the size of the photos relating to your edits, making all the others too small for their boxes. This needs addressing. Obscurasky (talk) 00:39, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that I will be expanding the sections in an attempt to bring it to FL status, and, Obscurasky, what I added was not too much information. Have a look at List of National Parks of the United States, for example, a featured list, to see what I mean. If you do not wish for me to mess up the page while I expand it, I am happy to work on it in my sandbox, where I continued working on it after you reverted my edits. Regards, Wackywace ^{converse | contribs} 06:17, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The new information is still excessive, far exceeding that even in the selected example you provide; but if you're going to bring all the sections up to the same standard, I think this be will be an improvement to the page nonetheless. I will not revert your edits while you do so. Obscurasky (talk) 06:58, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Obscurasky (talk · contribs) has failed to provide a cogent rationale for the removal of sourced info, and the replacement of it with completely unsourced info. -- Cirt (talk) 21:32, 20 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

?? Read my first comment; I didn't 'replace' anything, I only reverted Wackywace's edit - and in any case, that was not nothing to do with 'sourcing', it was because of excesive detail.
Obscurasky (talk) 23:06, 20 October 2010 (UTC) Sock puppetry[reply]

Check your revert again. In the process of reverting, you did indeed remove lots of sourced info, and replaced it with a completely unsourced page. -- Cirt (talk) 11:47, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I reverted back to Headbomb 9 September 2010 - which was the last page before the introduction of, what I considered to be, excessive detail. I think you're getting too wrapped up in this, it would be best for us both to stay focused on the article. Obscurasky (talk) 13:58, 21 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

New dishes

Here are a couple of candidates for the page. I don't feel like adding them seeing as how people get their knickers in a twist about the contents. (Personally, I like detail—people who don't like it can skip it, but if it's not there you don't know what you're missing.) Anyone else, feel free to add them.

The Bacon jam article is an orphan and there's a request for links to it.
There's something called caramelized bacon, which is similar to Pig Candy (??!) but lacks pecans. It sounds delicious.

Monado (talk) 00:47, 5 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Bacon Martini Photo

The description says to soak bacon in vodka until the vodka becomes opaque. The picture could not possibly represent a cocktail made with such vodka, as the drink is clear as water, while pictures of Bacon Martinis found by Google Images resemble "dirty" martinis. Shouldn't the picture represent the actual item? --Mfwills (talk) 00:20, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I agree, it should be removed.Obscurasky (talk) 09:55, 22 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on List of bacon dishes. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:27, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]