Talk:List of collaborative software/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Propose deleting a few entries

I see Cadence as a product but could not find it (the corresponding Wikipedia article was deleted) except this site which does not seem to have the collaboration software product listed here: http://www.cadence-software.com/#/Products/ I propose to delete this item from the list. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 213.138.230.142 (talk) 10:52, 31 August 2011 (UTC)

phpGroupWare

I see this platform listed in both open source and project collaboration lists; I would propose to keep in "project collaboration" section only those products that are designed with "project management" in mind, given that there is already a general list where all collaborative software products should be featuring, avoiding unwanted duplications.

Wiki Software

There already is list of wiki software and it is long. I don't think it is worthwhile to list wikis here again. -Hapsiainen 12:53, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

I think I agree. Perhaps we could just link to the List of wiki software from this article in the appropriate spot and remove those particular links? — Stevie is the man! Talk | Work 13:13, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
Done. -Hapsiainen 14:49, Apr 22, 2005 (UTC)

Since when is Interwoven free or open source? (under product list for web based solutions). -Mimi 12:49, Dec 20, 2005 (UTC)

Teamwork also is not really open source (only the domain classes). The license is proprietary. Should be moved out of the open source section. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.186.16.30 (talk) 10:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

References

The 2nd reference (cite note) refers to an apparent clarification (which doesn't make sense to me), and doesn't actually support the material that supposedly provided the information in the "Comparison of notable Collaboration Software" table.

Either the reference should be linked to the actual source material, or the page marked with the text that indicates it contains unreferenced/unverifiable material. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gregnx (talk • contribs) 16:25, 5 February 2011 (UTC)

Gobby

I think Gobby deserves mention here, although I'm not sure which section it would go in. I haven't really seen anything else like it. 66.20.189.94 16:31, 18 May 2006 (UTC)

I think Joomla! might also fit in here. Oberiko 12:14, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
My opinion is that Joomla is more of a Portal and Content Management system -it certainly could be used as a collaboration solution but I don't think it is developed with that particular usage as its driving focus.

Google Docs

Why no love for Google Docs here? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.136.242.1 (talk) 17:16, 29 November 2010 (UTC)

I'll add it in the main lists. Steve3003 (talk) 22:45, 2 November 2011 (UTC)

Redundant links

Some links are redundant, I think it's good enough to have one project listed one time.

Did some cleanup, hope it was not too bold. - 83.254.215.231 (talk) 17:17, 24 January 2008 (UTC)

Sort Projects alphabetically

Projects are not sorted alphabetically, sorting makes reading better.

New software

Can i add new software to this list?

more details about the software can be found at http://www.collaber.com

Our software is as powerfull as Microsoft Groove.. So we think it must be included in the list.

Thanks Rajesh

New platform

Please add "e-Deliberation" to the list of Collaborative Software with this descriptor: "Online platform for large group collaborative deliberation events to resolve complex problems or challenges. Yields a consent-based multifaceted strategy." The link should be to: https://www.e-deliberation.com Thank you Nisuc (talk) 21:12, 5 February 2013 (UTC)

Incorrect placement of some items

How can Microsoft Office Groove be Open Source / Free Software? In the corresponding article, it says it is proprietary. (Of course, I didn't even need to read the article to tell you that.)FSHero 16:03, 10 January 2007 (UTC)

Open-Source's Top Billing

Why is open source software in its own category here, and one that dominates the list? Wouldn't it make more sense to organize it by functional domain, collaborative capabilities (Email/IM groupware vs. data visualization vs. screen sharing), or some other logical categorization? Categorizing by license type seems unhelpful. Sam 06:44, 7 March 2007 (UTC)

MessagingMatrix

MessagingMatrix.com provides a much better (dynamic) grid comparison of messaging collaborative software, possibly provided certain titles & and a few attributes were added. It allows one to dynamically "Compare Microsoft Exchange, CommuniGate Pro, Novell Groupwise, Google Mail, and more here." says parent site CompareStuff.Net; and it includes Citadel/UX. So, folks, kindly add there the missing titles (as Group-Office & eGroupWare) and eventually move to there (for messaging) all the above comparison tables. —Preceding unsigned comment added by MBParker (talk • contribs)

Linkspam

The article is slowly accumulating linkspam again. Please see WP:EL, WP:SPAM, WP:NOT#LINK concerning the proper use of external links. --Ronz 16:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

I've removed the links. --Ronz 17:15, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

Inclusion criteria

The article needs some inclusion criteria for the entries, per WP:LIST. We can start by only listing collaborative software that already has their own articles. --Ronz (talk) 16:42, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

Done, let's see how long it lasts. :) - 83.254.215.231 (talk) 03:15, 2 February 2008 (UTC)

what can i say on the subject?? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.226.37.15 (talk) 20:31, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

Suggested additions

My company's collaborative video post-production software looks like it would fit well here. Here are some third party references:

If anyone agrees, feel free to add FORscene to this list. Stephen B Streater (talk) 22:44, 26 March 2010 (UTC)

Perhaps it would be useful to sort this entire article into different uses for collaboration software? I feel like the topic is relatively broad, and can apply to anything (e.g. web development, programming, word processing, CAD, mathematical simulation software like Mathematica or Matlab, etc.). With this in mind, there's a collaboration-based music production software for electronic musicians and audio engineers called Ohm Studio: http://www.ohmstudio.com/. It's a standard Digital Audio Workstation (DAW) with Internet and filesharing capabilities. Betatesting should finish in January of this year. This is just one example, and I'm sure there are programs of all kinds with these same capabilities. Apologies (and disregard) if this isn't the purpose of the article. [Anonymous user] 14:17, 6 January 2013 (UTC -9)

Citrix Online products (GoToMeeting etc.) missing

Citrix Online's collaboration products, especially GoToMeeting, are in the top 5 in North American usage... shouldn't they be included? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.185.229.40 (talk) 07:04, 15 July 2011 (UTC)

Comparison

Why not make a sort of comparison list, like with the Comparison of issue tracking systems on Wikipedia? That would make this page much more useful. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 130.89.8.160 (talk) 12:31, 6 December 2010 (UTC)

Clean-up required

Whoever tagged this article should have commented as to how it needed to be cleaned-up. I have removed entries that are linked to external sources rather than internal ones (see WP:LINKFARM) and removed Wikipedia:Red links. Someone familiar with the content-matter should go through and eliminate anything that doesn't belong on the list. --Walter Görlitz (talk) 01:47, 1 March 2011 (UTC)

Categories: can we clarify more?

This page could be far more useful if tools were sorted in two additional ways:

  • What is the access?
  • Which are cloud based, available online - no download required,
  • Which are cloud based, available online but require subscription to use (Many tools have free use with limitations - identify these)
  • Which are free downloads - (truly free -- not limited trial offers)
  • Which require download or software purchase with accompanying cost
  • What does collaborative tool do? What services does it provide?
  • Is it a wiki or website
  • Is it a document host or creator
  • Is it a schedule or calendar creator
  • Is it a database host
  • etc, etc, etc

MrLloyd025 (talk) 20:06, 1 February 2013 (UTC)


  • List Management: As in mailing list management? (a link would be nice)
  • XML Forms Management and workflow : Why XML? I suggest to have a broader category "Forms Management and workflow", perhaps linked to Form_(web)

--Marclaporte (talk) 04:00, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

Banckle Reference Reverted

@MER-C, for the recent reverts, I would like to share that Banckle offers a suite of collaborative tools and like DimDim and other web conferencing alternatives; Banckle Online Meeting is one of its web based tool for conducting web conferencing sessions that comes with a free API as well to help developers creating new applications by borrowing some of its features. Since this page section List_of_collaborative_software correspond exactly with Banckle Online Meeting and the listed tools DimDim and Zimbra are its competitors so I added Banckle to that list. Please visit this blog page as a reference and read out a head-to-head features comparison of Banckle Online Meeting with DimDim. Please make sure that by referencing Banckle Online Meeting, promotion or other marketable benefits were not intended. The mentioning was made just for the sake of awareness that Banckle offer the same free API as an alternative solution for conducting Online Meetings, Live Chats and File Sharings. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Khozman (talk • contribs) 00:35, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

Non-notable entries removed

I've gone ahead and once again removed the non-notable entries. See Talk:List_of_collaborative_software#Inclusion_criteria and Talk:List_of_collaborative_software#Clean-up_required. --Ronz (talk) 21:59, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Where did the specifications of all the open source enterprise groupware go?

It seems odd that that IBM Lotus and Microsoft are the only products listed in tables where I seem to recall several worthy open source projects in the past.

While not quite worthy of the library of Alexandria, having a tabular listing of features of the notable open source (and other commercial) 'alternatives' to the two market leaders would be worthy. I would suggest that any project which someone cares enough about to fill in a table with its features is probably worthy of WikiPedia.

q.v. http://www.opengroupware.org/, http://www.egroupware.org/, http://www.citadel.org/, http://www.kolab.org/, and http://www.zimbra.com/

New collaborative software Comidor

Can i add new software to this list?

The product is called Comidor and is a SaaS powertool for Small & Medium-sized Enterprises. More details about the software can be found at http://www.b-open.gr

Thank you in advance, Dimitrios — Preceding unsigned comment added by Istoidea (talk • contribs) 13:17, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

What about Moodle?

Smartsheet in Comparison table

Hi. Can we add Smartsheet to the "Comparison of collaborative software features" table? I've prepared a draft entry for them below David King, Ethical Wiki (COI) (Talk) 22:04, 25 September 2015 (UTC)

Name Wikis Web publishing Calendaring software Project Management Workflow system Document Management List Management XML Forms Management and workflow Discussion Blogs Surveys Time Tracking Business Intelligence Charting Bookmarking, Tagging, Rating and Comments Social software Enterprise search Office suite
Smartsheet No Yes[1] Yes[2] Yes[3] Yes[4] Yes[5] Yes No Yes[6] No Yes[7] Yes[8] No Yes[9] No No Yes[10] Yes, MS Office Interface

References

  1. ^ "Publishing Sheets & Reports". Smartsheet. December 3, 2012. Retrieved September 11, 2015.
  2. ^ "Calendars". Smartsheet. July 3, 2012. Retrieved September 11, 2015.
  3. ^ "Online Project Management Templates". Smartsheet. May 13, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2015.
  4. ^ Grant, Rebecca (December 3, 2012). "Smartsheet gets $26M to keep enterprise workflow under control". VentureBeat. Retrieved September 11, 2015. {{cite web}}: no-break space character in |title= at position 55 (help)
  5. ^ Bly, Robert (December 2010). Make Every Second Count : Time Management Tips and Techniques for More Success with Less Stress. Career Press, Incorporated. ISBN 9781601631336. Retrieved September 11, 2015.
  6. ^ "Using Discussions". Smartsheet. December 3, 2012. Retrieved September 11, 2015.
  7. ^ "Smart Survey Tool". Smartsheet. July 23, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2015.
  8. ^ "Time Tracker for Client Projects Template with Form". Smartsheet. May 13, 2014. Retrieved September 11, 2015.
  9. ^ "Gantt Charts". Smartsheet. July 5, 2012. Retrieved September 11, 2015.
  10. ^ "Searching in Smartsheet". Smartsheet. December 3, 2012. Retrieved September 11, 2015.
@CorporateM:  Done — Rhododendrites talk \\ 15:27, 28 September 2015 (UTC)

Microsoft requesting edits

Hello, my name is Patricia Wagner and I'm an employee of Microsoft. I work in the Cloud+Enterprise division as a content publisher for Visual Studio Team Services, Team Foundation Server, and Application Lifecycle Management products. We are reviewing Wikipedia articles that relate to our areas and would like to update some to better represent the current state and features of our products. Please review the changes below and let me know if they are acceptable to you. Thank you very much for your consideration.


Please update this item:Microsoft Team Foundation Server, developer collaboration platform
to: Microsoft Team Foundation Server, developer and Agile tools collaboration platform


Add this item just below it: Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services, developer and Agile tools collaboration cloud platform


In the "General Inforamtion" section:
Please update the line for "Microsoft Team Foundation Server" to:
Microsoft Team Foundation Server Microsoft 2015 2015 2005 SQL Server or SQL EE Proprietary


Add a new line just below it:
Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services Microsoft Current Azure Cloud Proprietary


In the "Comparison of collaborative software features" section, please add a new line just after "Microsoft Team Foundation Server" that reads:
Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services No No Yes Yes Yes Yes No No Yes No No Yes No Yes Yes Yes Yes No


In the "Comparison of targets" section:

Please add a new line at the end that reads:

Microsoft Visual Studio Team Services No Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes


In the "Open source software" section:

Just after the Spicebird entry, please add a new line that reads: Team Foundation Server, enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software

Just after the Teambox entry, please add a new line that reads:

Visual Studio Team Services, cloud platform of integrated suite of tools for teams to share code, track work, and ship software


In the "Groupware: Web based software" section, please add two new lines, just after the SOGo entry:

- Team Foundation Server, enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software

- Visual Studio Team Services, cloud platform of integrated suite of tools for teams to share code, track work, and ship software


In the "Web-based software" section:

Please add a new line just after the Simple Groupware entry that reads:

Team Foundation Server, enterprise-grade server for teams to share code, track work, and ship software

Please add a new line just after the Traction TeamPage entry that reads:

Visual Studio Team Services, cloud platform of integrated suite of tools for teams to share code, track work, and ship software

Pat MSFT (talk) 18:14, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

 Partly done: I have updated the entries on Team Foundation Server, but I have not added anything about Visual Studio Team Services, as that is referenced in the article for TFS as another version of TFS, which probably doesn't merit its own entry. Additionally, I have not added either to the section for open source software, as it appears to me that neither is open source. —  crh 23  (Talk) 20:56, 23 April 2016 (UTC)

Note on notability requirement added

I have added a brief hidden note to offer some guidance on Wikipedia's notability requirements for new editors (based on WP:GNG and general list guidelines). Please feel free to tweak my English or eventual ambiguities. GermanJoe (talk) 15:55, 7 June 2016 (UTC)

What's the process to add a link in this page ?

Hello,

I would like to understand the process I should follow to edit this page and add a link to a new collaborative software in it?

Thanks! Vishwa CTO - www.mangoapps.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vishwamalhotra (talk • contribs) 13:52, 4 November 2016 (UTC)

Hi, Vishwa - I didn't want to let an entire year pass by without an answer. Wikipedia's Help section is great for starters.Clepsydrae (talk) 19:39, 22 September 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:List_of_collaborative_software/Archive_1&oldid=1164850758"