Talk:Livermorium

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Livermorium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:13, 2 April 2016 (UTC)

External links modified[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Livermorium. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit User:Cyberpower678/FaQs#InternetArchiveBot*this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

As of February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete the "External links modified" sections if they want, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{sourcecheck}} (last update: 15 July 2018).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.


Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 01:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

'This is the first molecule to be studied in detail to display this phenomenon, dubbed "supervalent hybridization"'[edit]

Not true! See Greenwood and Earnshaw, p. 117, for studies of sd hybridisation in CaF2. Double sharp (talk) 12:03, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

More about spin-orbit effects for H2X (X = Te, Po, Lv): http://aip.scitation.org/doi/10.1063/1.2187001 Double sharp (talk) 15:53, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

Question about the discovery[edit]

This article and those on the other superheavy elements talk about how they were discovered by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory and the Joint Institute for Nuclear Research. I know the teams worked together, but was the element actually discovered at both facilities? Would you say radon was discovered in Canada because that's where Ernest Rutherford and Robert B. Owens were at the time? Squee3 (talk) 02:31, 15 December 2016 (UTC)

The Lv atoms were seen at JINR, but the Cm target necessary for their production was made at LLNL. (Same for the pairs Fl/Pu, Mc,Ts/Bk, and Og/Cf). Hence cooperation was necessary and both facilities receive credit. Double sharp (talk) 07:15, 15 December 2016 (UTC)
Thanks, but the question is where it was discovered, not by whom. Squee3 (talk) 18:06, 17 December 2016 (UTC)
Well, it was certainly discovered in Dubna, then. Double sharp (talk) 03:51, 18 December 2016 (UTC)
Thank you! That's the information I needed. Squee3 (talk) 19:54, 21 December 2016 (UTC)

But the things about Fr say that EN(Fr)>EN(Cs)[edit]

So it's possible to be possible to make hydrogen-livermoride... Alfa-ketosav (talk) 11:12, 24 June 2018 (UTC)

Just because Fr is more electronegative than Cs does not mean that Lv is more electronegative than Po. The two situations are different; for Fr 7s is relativistically stabilised, but for Lv 7p3/2 is relativistically destabilised. Double sharp (talk) 13:50, 24 June 2018 (UTC)
P.S. Indeed, Lv is expected to be significantly more electropositive than Po. Double sharp (talk) 06:11, 11 February 2019 (UTC)