Talk:Mansehra District

This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Pakistan Mid‑importance

	Pakistan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PakistanWikipedia:WikiProject PakistanTemplate:WikiProject PakistanPakistan articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Pakistani districts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pakistani districts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Pakistani districts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pakistani districtsWikipedia:WikiProject Pakistani districtsTemplate:WikiProject Pakistani districtsPakistani districts articles

Geography

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Geography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of geography on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GeographyWikipedia:WikiProject GeographyTemplate:WikiProject Geographygeography articles

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Geography To-do list:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : See Requested articles/Social sciences/Geography, cities, regions and named places and Missing articles about Locations
Assess : Tag related article talk pages with {{WikiProject Geography}}. To help assess the quality and importance of geography articles, please see: Unassessed geography articles and Unknown-importance geography articles.
Cleanup : See Geography articles needing attention
Deletion sorting : Listed at Geographic related deletion discussions
Geographical coordinates : See Articles missing geocoordinate data by country
Infobox : See Geography articles needing infoboxes
Map : See Wikipedia requested maps
Notability : See Geography articles with topics of unclear notability
Photo : See Wikipedia requested photographs of places
Stubs : See Geography stubs

Guild of Copy Editors

This article was copy edited by Miniapolis, a member of the Guild of Copy Editors, on 22 November 2013.Guild of Copy EditorsWikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsTemplate:WikiProject Guild of Copy EditorsGuild of Copy Editors articles

Previous copyedits:
/
	This article was copy edited by Hillbillygirl on 27 February 2007.

Hello! i have corrected the information regarding union councils in district mansehra but the page format is a bit messed up, so if anyone can fix that it would be great and also correct if there is some further need for amendment in the page. Cheers!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wikitanoli (talk • contribs) 18:18, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Languages of Khyber-Puhktunkhwa (Map)

Languages of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa (Pakistan Census 1998) http://www.pbs.gov.pk/sites/default/files/other/yearbook2011/Population/16-20.pdf — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerkhan007 (talk • contribs) 12:09, 12 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The language map is completely off.. Battagram and Torgar is majority pashto speaking areas while western Mansehra (ogai, baffa, agror valley etc) and western Haripur (Sirin Valley, guddun valley, ghazi etc) are also pashto speaking. ... Tank is shown as Saraiki speaking while shangla is shown as hindko speaking.. again wrong representation as both the districts are pashto speaking majority. Tigerkhan007 (talk) 20:03, 7 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Map being used in various articles pertaining to languages of Khyber Pukhtunkhwa is incorrect and biased. It is showing tank as Seraiki speaking which is incorrect as majority of people in Tank speak Pashto. It is showing Karak as Hindko speaking while we know that almost 99% of the population of Karak is Pashto speaking Khattak. It is showing battagram as hindko speaking while we all know that most of the people in Battagram speak Pashto. Similarly, it is showing Shangla as hindko speaking, which is incorrect as most of the people their also speak Pashto. Finally, it is showing Toorghar district as Hindko speaking while we know most of the people their also speak Pashto. I think all this show biasness or incompetence on the part of the person who included that Map. Furthermore, it should also be noted that the map fails to show that most of the people on western side of Mansehra and Haripur speak Pashto, while most on western side of D.I.Khan also speak Pashto. I feel that the Map has grossly exaggerated the number of speakers of other languages. Tigerkhan007 (talk) 17:21, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

I have tried to talk about the incorrect map being used with everyone, but no one has been able to provide any rationale on why the districts such as Battagram, toorghar, Shangla, Buner, Tank, Karak, etc are shown as Hindko and saraiki speaking when the text states that most of the population their speaks pashto. And also this is a matter of general knowledge that most of the population in the above mentioned districts speaks pashto. Moroever, due to this incorrect and biased map there is a contraditcion between the text and the map being used on the same articale. Therefore, i have replaced this incorrect map with a more accurate one. This will not only make the page more representative of the reallity but will also make wikipedia more reliable. Tigerkhan007 (talk) 11:13, 12 August 2013 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tigerkhan007 (talk • contribs)

What ho?

I have just noticed that a new article Sabir Shah Mansehra seems to lead here--what is he link? What ho? Please remove that so-called new article thanks. 39.54.80.80 (talk) 07:43, 7 September 2013 (UTC)Farid Muhammad Khan[reply]

Copyvio concerns

Although the page was again tagged for copyediting, I removed a big chunk of copyvio added in April 2013 (see history; the editor has been advised). I don't think it should be copyedited at this time, in case more remains. Miniapolis 23:48, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: http://www.mansehra.com/mansehra-history/ http://www.mansehra.com/mansehra-history/. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Miniapolis 02:27, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of false information

I have removed false information, as historically no Gujjar or Pashtuns/Pathans ever ruled Mansehra. Thanks 39.54.130.12 (talk) 12:51, 15 April 2015 (UTC) Prof (r) Hilda Khan, Pakistan[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mansehra District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 04:55, 1 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Mansehra District. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20071228010000/http://www.panwfp.gov.pk/index.php/members/bydistrict/en/9/57 to http://www.panwfp.gov.pk/index.php/members/bydistrict/en/9/57

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:09, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]