Talk:Map of the Soul: 7

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Map of the Soul: 7 article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Map of the Soul: 7 has been listed as one of the Music good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: January 2, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Albums

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum articles

Korea High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Korean popular culture working group.

Pop music Mid‑importance

	Pop music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance

	R&B and Soul Music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hip hop Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Hip hop, a collaborative effort to build a useful resource for and improve the coverage of hip hop on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Hip hopWikipedia:WikiProject Hip hopTemplate:WikiProject Hip hopHip hop articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Tracklist

Is anyone going to put the tracklist on this article? The tracklist was revealed today.--2601:194:480:C790:4524:12C6:5987:5F7F (talk) 16:25, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Other data (writer, composer, producer) are still unavailable for the entire list to be included in the article. —Nairb.Idi9 (talk) 17:53, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"We Are Bulletproof: The Eternal" was also co-written by DJ Swivel (his tweet), but that's all we know so far at this moment. --2A02:810B:4040:3618:81F3:786C:12B3:F5DA (talk) 21:24, 16 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Personnel section

DanielleTH Alexanderlee : Can a Personnel section be added to this article? Can the credits in AllMusic page here be used for this? Thanks. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 06:37, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Ashleyyoursmile: I'd advise against using AllMusic if possible, since that database is also user contributed. It's usually best to use the actual credits booklet found in the album, and often times people upload that online. I can probably write one up later today. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)} 17:03, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@DanielleTH: That would be much appreciated. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 17:16, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

If you are interested, on the it.wiki album page I have already added the personnel section, with track-by-track credits from the booklet. It only needs to be re-translated to English. --Chiya^ko92 18:28, 20 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on it in my sandbox; I'm currently arranging the list by alphabetical order. Feel free to contribute. --Chiya^ko92 10:48, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 11:45, 21 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiyako92: Looks great! if there's any part you haven't gotten to yet I wouldn't mind finishing it up for you! Thank you for doing that up, it looks like it took a while. DanielleTH ^{(Say hi!)}

Done There are 60 credits per column, but according to one's screen resolution the second one may look longer. --Chiya^ko92 09:08, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Chiyako92: Looks amazing. Thank you so much. --Ashleyyoursmile (talk) 11:10, 22 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Tour

Should the article cover the 'Map of the Soul ON:E' concert and exhibition happening online on October 10th and 11th? We don't know the performance setlist yet, but it is a continuation of the Map of the Soul series. Should we wait until after the concert has happened or should we update the article now? — Aerimars (talk) 22:11, 28 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Sound samples

I am thinking if 2 sound samples could be added to the "Music and lyrics" section to make the readers understand the nuances about the tracks on the album. I have seen several album articles (Folklore and Future Nostalgia, among others of course) that have audio samples and would like to add them here as well. I'm a bit wary of choosing the tracks and would welcome any suggestions in this regard. --Ashley yoursmile! 16:12, 12 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

Passed. Cherrell410^{(t · c)} 15:45, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Map of the Soul: 7/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 23:31, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I made the necessary changes as suggested.

I couldn't find other reliable references for 137 and 138, as they are the original sources. kitb (talk) 05:50, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

Initial comments: looks like a very well written article that the author(s) clearly have spent a lot of time on

Is it well written?
A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
Is it verifiable with no original research?
A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

B. Reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose):

C. It contains no original research:

D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
A few of the sources brought back high scores on the copyvio detector, but it was quotes from the band
Is it broad in its coverage?
A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
Talks about each of the 20 songs, but keeps it clear, concise, and makes a point
Is it neutral?
It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
Is it stable?
It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content:

B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
Overall:
Pass or Fail:

I am going to leave any comments about stuff needing fixing below:

Lead, 2nd para, 1st sentence: it explains who they worked with but it didn't explain what they did together
Lead, 4th para, last sentence: could you add that they announced the tour in support/promotion/to promote of the album
Background: source needed for the picture
Music and lyrics, 1st para: wikilink human psychology
Music and lyrics, 2nd para: be consistent with putting the sources after the genre/idea or at the end of the sentence
Songs: in this section on was stylized as "ON" where in the lead it is stylized as "On", same issue in release in promotion section
Tour: According to the tour article, it was set to begin on April 11 in Seoul instead of the 25th in santa clara
Track listing: source(s)
Personnel: source(s)
Sources 137, 138, 58, 68 should be replaced as they aren't reliable

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.