Jump to content

Talk:Marchioness disaster/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

Hurlingham

Should the fact that passengers and crew on Hurlingham saw the accident and rescued some of the survivors be mentioned? http://www.nationalhistoricships.org.uk/register/257/hurlingham 92.40.120.150 (talk) 13:28, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Marchioness

In 1976 I saw a passenger boat called Marchioness on the Norfolk Broads, and the name stuck with me because at the time it struck me as quite unusual. I have no idea whether it was the same boat, of course, but I'd be interested to find out. Lee M 00:17, 30 March 2006 (UTC)

Do we know when the boat was built, and how long she had been in operation when sunk? Drutt (talk) 10:09, 6 June 2010 (UTC)

Cutting Off Hands For Identification

I am surprised to see no mention of this in the article as it was a matter of some controversy at the time. I am not going to insert it as I don't have a source for the information, I just read it in the press (so don't even know if it was found to be true). Can someone with in-depth knowledge of the disaster please put the appropriate section in the article? DavidFarmbrough (talk) 15:15, 17 May 2012 (UTC)

This was not a procedure of first resort. I am not sure this was in relation to the Marchioness disaster, but I did read in a woman's magazine an article on the mother of a Thames boatman, who recalled being told his hands had to be cut off to permit the taking of fingerprints because after a boating disaster his body was so long in being found that he could not otherwise be identified. He was subsequently cremated and his ashes scattered on the Thames.Cloptonson (talk) 13:11, 2 April 2015 (UTC)
This document researchbriefings.files.parliament.uk/documents/SN00769/SN00769.pdf establishes that it happened. Maproom (talk) 20:39, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Both boats

It seems that alcohol was involved in both boats. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 92.27.11.202 (talk) 17:48, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

Southwark

I am not sure why those who died were mentioned in Southwark Cathedral. Many were not of the same denomination as those with the Cathedral now in their hands. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 46.65.7.129 (talk) 13:33, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

I have seen the memorial. It seems denominational differences were disregarded. The churchmanship of Southwark Cathedral's clergy has tended to be liberal.Cloptonson (talk) 13:14, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Controversy

Worth having a section about this? I remember the fury about the Daily Mail headline "Death of the Beautiful People" and there were some other controversial pieces of coverage in the media in the days following. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.0.171.64 (talk) 15:45, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

If one can find the newspaper coverage to cite. I recall reading at the time that it was much implied the victims were all rich. The parents of an Australian victim were distressed by the high cost of repatriating his body.Cloptonson (talk) 13:18, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marchioness disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 21:34, 1 June 2017 (UTC)

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Marchioness disaster. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 18:58, 9 September 2017 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Marchioness_disaster/Archive_1&oldid=914408132"