Jump to content

Talk:Max Chilton

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2009 Formula 3 wins

[edit]

In the paragraph discussing the 2009 season in Formula 3, the article states that "Chilton took two race wins in the Autódromo Internacional do Algarve in Portimão"; however, the 2009 British Formula Three season article shows that both Algarve races were won by Jules Bianchi and that Chilton won only the last race. Rentzepopoulos (talk) 00:03, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think the wording is unintentionally dubious. Although Bianchi won both those races, he was inelegible to score points. Chilton, who was entitled to score points, was classified as the winner because he was the first driver elegible to score. The "two race wins" in the body of the article probably refer to his win in the second race and his overall win in the second race at Brands Hatch. This could easily be fixed with a re-wording of the article, such as this:
Chilton took two race wins during the season; the first at the Autódromo Internacional do Algarve in Portimão, and the second in his final Formula Three race at Brands Hatch.
I don't think an explanation of how drivers are elegible or inelegible to score points is needed. Chilton is recognised as the race winner and received all the points the race winner would receive, even though he was the third driver to finish. Prisonermonkeys (talk) 02:45, 20 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

2012 Race results section

[edit]

I'm removing this because Max didn't race in 2012. Marussia was Glock and Pic in 2012.Jasphetamine (talk) 21:58, 4 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your change - it is WP:F1 convention to include seasons in which a driver participated in official practice sessions as a "third driver", as Chilton did at the 2012 Abu Dhabi Grand Prix - see the "2006" row of Sebastian Vettel's F1 results table as an example. DH85868993 (talk) 11:55, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
You are correct. Good revert. Jasphetamine (talk) 20:39, 5 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 3 external links on Max Chilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

checkY An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 17:37, 23 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Max Chilton. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:05, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]