This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Agreed. This has the appearance of soapboxing dissatisfaction over the recent election news coverage by party. This section should be balanced if retained. Hwy43 (talk) 05:22, 7 June 2012 (UTC)
I added the report from the foundation (name escapes me), simply because I was fascinated that someone had studied this and I had never read anything about it before. But this is simply a starting point. I hope there are other secondary sources that can shed more light on the issue. Please add them as you find them, but please do not remove what was posted originally unless there is clear consensus reason to do so. It is the base from which we can expand. --Kevlar (talk • contribs) 22:45, 20 June 2012 (UTC)
The consensus thus far appears to be to remove the content. It is bizarre that a generalize article has been created for the purpose of sharing this foundation's observation. This micro-level observation sticks out in an article that should be mainly a macro-level summary of media in Alberta. Hwy43 (talk) 05:12, 23 June 2012 (UTC)