Talk:Mega Man X3

MMZ

Ok, MMZ, why in Gods holy name did you revert?

My Michelle - Guns and Roses

Who-ever put that Citation there - no - its not needed. It's been long established that Capcom (or at least Megaman's creators) are Guns and Roses fans. (Or didn't Megaman X5's maverick names and obvious Rose references through-out the game make that obvious?) As for the music being similar to My Michelee - its not that hard to notice, in fact, its a pretty blatent copy - the tune may be in the wrong order, but they still use exactly the same notes and beats. Heres a comparision (Sorry for the mp3 file but its the easiest way) http://sprites-inc.co.uk/Guns%20N'%20Roses%20Comparsion.mp3 --ACE Spark 20:44, 5 July 2006 (UTC) Mp3 Link - I have no problem with it being removed (I figured it would), but it does at least prove my point. --ACE Spark 13:36, 7 July 2006 (UTC)

First?

From trivia: This game was the first Mega Man game to feature an animated opening sequence.

Is this refering to the FMV opening done for the Playstation version? Either way it's incorrect because for one, Mega Man X2 already had an opening sequence (which was animated), and even if it's talking about FMV I'm pretty sure that either Mega Man 8 or Mega Man X4 came first. (user:HannuMakinen)

Yes, its talking about FMV sequence, and if you want to get techincal, Megaman 2 was the first game with an opening sequence, not X2. :P No, the Conversion of X3 was the first, im pretty sure that it came out before X4 or 8 did.. --82.37.115.147 02:01, 28 July 2006 (UTC)

"Mechs"?

"Gold Armor - If X gets all four body upgrades, all four mechs, all four Sub Tanks, and all eight Heart Tanks, but none of the chips, a secret capsule in Doppler's first stage allows him to get all four chips at once."

What are "mechs", and where/how do I get them? --Plainnym 13:25, 13 May 2007 (UTC)

It's refering to the Ride Armors (Chimera, Frog, Hawk, and Kangaroo), but I don't remember where they are off-hand. Godslayer 18:19, 31 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Megamanx3 02.png

Image:Megamanx3 02.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:31, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

Release date

This game was first released in USA and later in Japan? Isn't it the reverse? --189.77.94.139 (talk) 00:34, 16 August 2008 (UTC)

Bootleg version?

I watched something on YouTube that there's a Bootleg version of this game. This bootleg version of this game was in the Sega Genesis platform. If you look this video, you may understand what I mean. Thank you! --Girla PurpleHeart (talk) 02:33, 31 August 2009 (UTC)

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Mega Man X3. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110728023345/http://japan.gamespot.com/goods/news/20416112/ to http://japan.gamespot.com/goods/news/20416112/
• Added archive https://www.webcitation.org/6BEjgyXg9?url=http://www.1up.com/features/jumping-shark-man to http://www.1up.com/do/feature?cId=3159529

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 18 January 2022).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:09, 24 January 2018 (UTC)

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Mega Man X3/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: TeenAngels1234 (talk · contribs) 09:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

Since I'm kinda busy this is gonna take some time. But anyway, here we go.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 09:14, 5 April 2023 (UTC)

• " has been above average". In what sense was the reception "above average"? What is the average? I would change this expression and expand the sentence while we are at it.
  • Done.
• The whole part about sales of the SNES version ("The North American and the European SNES version of Mega Man X3 are very rare .... such as eBay") I would put in Reception. It seems more appropriate there.
  • Done
• "converted it to data in her leisure". What?
  • Removed.

@Tintor2: The rest is fine.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 16:40, 8 April 2023 (UTC) @TeenAngels1234: Tried revising everything. Removed the average as there is not too much from Metacritic to back such claim.Tintor2 (talk) 17:41, 8 April 2023 (UTC) @TeenAngels1234: Anything missing? I went ahead and removed the references from the lead and balanced the date.Tintor2 (talk) 22:09, 10 April 2023 (UTC) GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. Is it well written?

   A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:

   B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it verifiable with no original research?

   A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:

   B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons—science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:

   C. It contains no original research:

   D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:

   B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):

4. Is it neutral?

   It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:

5. Is it stable?

   It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:

6. Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?

   A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:

   B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

   Perfect. Good prose, good grammar, reliable sources. Good job.--TeenAngels1234 (talk) 09:11, 12 April 2023 (UTC)