Talk:Merry company

A fact from Merry company appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 1 October 2013 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that art historians often find it difficult to judge whether 17th-century merry company paintings (example illustrated) show scenes of prostitution?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2013/October. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Merry company.

Wikipedia

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Congratulations

....on an interesting DYK!

Comment:

The image of a painting by Jacob Ochtervelt does not appear to be the one mentioned in the text. My Impression from the text is that there are no females present in that painting, only painted portraits. The inclusion of an image, adjacent to that text, by the same artist , is confusing.
The image itself is interesting. The caption could be expanded to indicate that it is not the image referred to. And also make passing reference to whatever is going on between the man and woman in the background.

Amandajm (talk) 00:21, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! It is the same image, which has a full page illustration in Franits. I agree Franits' "an elegant gathering of well-heeled youths..." suggests men only. Ok, fudged. I cut his full description. Johnbod (talk) 03:00, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Merry company. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110721134904/http://arts.tau.ac.il/departments/images/stories/journals/arthistory/Assaph2/assaph2-08friedman.pdf to http://arts.tau.ac.il/departments/images/stories/journals/arthistory/Assaph2/assaph2-08friedman.pdf

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 20:11, 8 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Transliteration problem

Apart Kolfin, is there another Art historian dealing with this terminology ? For instance, I can't find wrolijke gezelschappen in the Netherland's Wikipedia : isn't it rather odd ? --Marc-AntoineV (talk) 13:19, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]