Talk:Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie
The contents of the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers The Movie: Original Soundtrack Album page were merged into Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie on 13 June 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
The contents of the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers The Movie: Original Motion Picture Score page were merged into Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie on 13 June 2022. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Mighty Morphin Power Rangers The Movie: Original Motion Picture Score was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 12 June 2022 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here. |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Mighty Morphin Power Rangers: The Movie article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Eltar
[edit]'Though not canon, the movie is the first time Zordon's home planet of Eltar was mentioned.'
I'm quite sure it's canon. It was mentioned in one of the Turbo episodes, no? gssq 15:15, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Well, it's generally taken that the movie exists out of the normal storyline of the Power Rangers universe, so even if it is mentioned in the movie, the movie is not considered to be canon. When it is later mentioned in the Turbo series, it is then canon. Ryūlóng 21:11, 17 September 2006 (UTC)
- Generally taken by whom? Usually, a movie is considered canon. Lots42 (talk) 16:38, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Does that mean that it was retconned into the continuity? -Alph
- Very likely. Ryūlóng 08:00, 13 October 2006 (UTC)
Brady Bunch?
[edit]Ivan mentions it that he missed it. What is it?—The preceding unsigned comment was added by 124.83.10.112 (talk)
- The Brady Bunch was an American television series in the 1970s. It is a pop culture reference.—Ryūlóng (竜龍) 22:13, 20 November 2006 (UTC)
The rest of the story
[edit]A nice one, but you didn't mention the end of the story. I remember it when I was a child, and the rest of the story goes: When the Power Rangers return to the lab after defeating Ivan Ooze, they find that Zordon had already died by the time they returned to Earth. They join hands and concentrate on their powers to resurrect Zordon and bring him back as a being in a tube once more. You should add the ending in more detail. --Angeldeb82 00:27, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs improvement, please feel free to make those changes. Wikipedia is a wiki, so anyone can edit almost any article by simply following the Edit this page link at the top. You don't even need to log in (although there are many reasons why you might want to). The Wikipedia community encourages you to be bold in updating pages. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes — they're likely to be found and corrected quickly. If you're not sure how editing works, check out how to edit a page, or use the sandbox to try out your editing skills. New contributors are always welcome.—Řÿūłóñģ (竜龍) 07:03, 2 December 2006 (UTC)
Why should we say:
"It is believed by some that this movie takes place in an alternate timeline from the Power Rangers television show (similar to a fanfiction AU), as numerous differences appear between the two."
instead of:
"The movie doesn't attempt to respect entirely the television show storyline."
It's not like those who wrote the movie had seen a different show; it's just they didn't care so much. --euyyn 16:33, 19 December 2006 (UTC)
Uh...
[edit]The "Differences between the movie and the show" states that "This is possibly due to Kimberly being treated like Tommy's second-in-command following the departure of Jason Scott Lee". I believe it should be changed to Jason Lee Scott. --89.1.203.158 09:16, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
- Done. -- RattleMan 15:53, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
Reception
[edit]There is no reception section. What gives? It was here last time I visited this page. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.236.73.234 (talk) 03:50, 29 August 2009 (UTC)
Plot Possibilities
[edit]Officially this movie takes place in another dimension right? so wouldn't it be quite possible that Ivan Ooze still rests beneath Angel Grove? If so, couldn't there be a plot involving it now that Saban re-bought the rights to the series? Even though the "Z-wave" wiped out all evil in the galaxy, Ooze my still exist because his egg kept him in so it may have kept the Z-wave out. Ooze's Ectomorphicon would also still exist since they were inactive, the same principle that kept Serpentera from destruction. They were said to be "capable of enslaving the entire universe" So if Ooze does return, it'd be one hell of an episode! Azekual (talk) 08:06, 12 July 2010 (UTC)
there should be a development section
[edit]many other movies have it so it seems reasonable. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.208.86.142 (talk) 11:56, 27 February 2011 (UTC)
Production source
[edit]The source for the production was created by Paul Matthews, an art department electrician for the movie. Since the relationship between Matthews and the film was strong, I believe this qualifies to be production information per WP:SELFPUB. Thoughts? Lord Sjones23 (talk - contributions) 02:16, 7 December 2015 (UTC)
Plot
[edit]I liked it detailed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.83.60.230 (talk) 02:05, 22 December 2015 (UTC)
Copyedit request
[edit]Working on the ce. MasterSloper516 (talk) 03:29, 20 December 2016 (UTC)
- Done with the ce. MasterSloper516 (talk) 02:23, 30 December 2016 (UTC)
“Sequel”
[edit]This movie is not in the continuity of the TV series (with an alternate storyline of the rangers getting their Ninja powers in season 3) and since the movie Turbo is a continuation of the series, Turbo is not a sequel to MMPR The Movie BlackAdvisor (talk) 16:20, 9 November 2021 (UTC)
- and the 2017 movie belongs to neither continuity also, so they’re less a series than a ‘collection’, probably BlackAdvisor (talk) 02:51, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- C-Class Tokusatsu articles
- Low-importance Tokusatsu articles
- WikiProject Tokusatsu articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class Australian cinema articles
- Australian cinema task force articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class science fiction articles
- Low-importance science fiction articles
- WikiProject Science Fiction articles
- C-Class 20th Century Studios articles
- Low-importance 20th Century Studios articles
- C-Class 20th Century Studios articles of Low-importance
- WikiProject 20th Century Studios articles
- Articles copy edited by the Guild of Copy Editors
- C-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- C-Class Queensland articles
- Low-importance Queensland articles
- WikiProject Queensland articles
- WikiProject Australia articles