Talk:Miles Edgeworth

Video games: Visual novels / Characters Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article is supported by the visual novels task force.

This article is supported by the Video game characters task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Comment by TheSOB (09:15, 11 August 2007)

You ron. DL-6 is the case where Edgeworth's father was killed; SL-9 is the case where whoever killed a bunch of people. I don't know if it was really Joe Darke yet; I haven't finished. — Preceding unsigned comment added by TheSOB (talk • contribs) 09:15, 11 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Spoiler

The spoiler tag is not unnecessary. If I read an article about Edgeworth and go to the "Justice for All" section, I don't expect it to reveal the most important part of the ending of the game. See criteria 1 and 2 at WP:SPOILER#When spoiler warnings may be appropriate. Melsaran (talk) 18:18, 11 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WP:SPOILER points out that spoiler tags are generally inappropriate in articles about fictional characters. An article written about a fictional character is going to have to discuss plot details, since that is what a fictional character is made of. And we do expect an encyclopedia article to cover all important points about the character, including the endings of the game. It would be surprising if the article did not cover the ending, because that would mean the article is incomplete.

We might be able to fix up the section headers to be more clear, though - I can't tell what the current section headers are trying to say. — Carl (CBM · talk) 12:23, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of a reference

@ThanatosApprentice: Please avoid removing content that belongs to fairly reliable website and even got feedback from Takumi himself. For some reason, something similar happened in June to Phoenix's article resulting into an anon being blocked from editing especially after it was revealed it was a sockpuppet. If there is more content you want to add to Edgeworth's article, you are welcome to but please avoid removing content especially after how much Cukie Gherkin cleaned it up. Cheers.Tintor2 (talk) 19:44, 10 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]