Talk:Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

On the ever changing title

The game is now Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2

theyre putting in the Call of Duty part so that way ppl will associate modern warfare 2 with call of duty so that newcomers to the game wont think its just a new standalone game. they want to strengthen the franchise by associating the names together. i hav 2 links. i dont kno how to change the title of an article though so can someone do that....? (link below clearly stating that the name has changed for a pretty good reason i might add)

http://www.shacknews.com/onearticle.x/59481

http://news.vgchartz.com/news.php?id=4228 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mark0528 (talk • contribs) 04:28, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Going to known as simply "Modern Warfare 2"?

There's some chatter that it's going to be titled simply "Modern Warfare 2" (http://xbox360.gamespy.com/xbox-360/call-of-duty-6/966567p1.html). I'm thinking we should wait for an official word before moving it to Modern Warfare 2, so I reversed the recent page move. –xeno (talk) 17:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

I think we can move it back, more and more sites are reporting it: http://www.joystiq.com/2009/03/26/activision-modern-warfare-has-taken-on-a-life-of-its-own/ 68.145.34.136 (talk) 20:24, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

It's official now: http://investor.activision.com/releasedetail.cfm?ReleaseID=373355 –xeno (talk) 20:32, 26 March 2009 (UTC)

Apparently "Call of Duty" is back in the name: http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=214548 Can anyone confirm this? Crazydog115 (talk) 11:29, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

I don't consider that any official confirmation. Griffith apparently did refer to the game with the "Call of Duty" once but it doesn't seem as if he declared it as an official title. I'd wait for a direct statement of a name change. Dancter (talk) 15:46, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Anyone who wants to check what Griffith actually said can listen to the conference call or read the transcript. Dancter (talk) 21:59, 8 May 2009 (UTC)

Look, I have an official statement from Activision saying that the name is officially "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2".(http://news.zergwatch.com/2009/05/18/activision-its-call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2/) Will people stop reverting my changes now? Deathstar79 (talk) 16:39, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Click through to Zergwatch's source. Dancter (talk) 17:05, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Right, sorry. Deathstar79 (talk) 22:30, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

Final box art calls it "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2" (http://twitter.com/fourzerotwo/status/2555334500). I've edited the article's Marketing section to show this. Fire (talk) 21:25, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Also a confirmed source, link The Phantomnaut (talk) 23:09, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I believe we're waiting for an official announcement. They've changed the name so many times that we need to be absolutely sure. -- Commdor {Talk} 23:14, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

A little more confirmation in the 3rd paragraph (Kind of) http://kotaku.com/5315981/infinity-ward-talks-modern-warfare-2-43-stories-up UltimateSin01 (talk) 18:17, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you. While Bowling deliberately leaves the door open for an official name change in the future, I think this is good enough to settle the move debate for now. Dancter (talk) 19:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I don't think it should be moved, if that's what your saying. Bowling is saying that is CoD:MW2 to let the community know that it's the sequel to CoD4, but its going to remain simply as MW2. UltimateSin01 (talk) 11:18, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Unfortunately, placing the various naming threads next to one another hasn't done much to reduce redundant discussions. Dancter (talk) 20:25, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Found another article but still confusion http://www.platformnation.com/2009/07/20/call-of-duty-depends/. They put the 'Call of Duty' name on the standalone game box but not on either special editions. So if you buy the Hardened or Prestige edition your only playing 'Modern Warfare 2', but if you bought the game-only version your playing 'Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2'? UltimateSin01 (talk) 18:40, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

game title

Apparantly the publisher has changed the name to "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2".

Sources: http://www.xboxic.com/news/5276 http://www.computerandvideogames.com/article.php?id=214548

--Shadyaftrmathgunit (talk) 13:42, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

See http://www.destructoid.com/right-now-call-of-duty-is-not-attached-to-modern-warfare-2-131432.phtml The game is still "Modern Warfare 2," the interview you cite was a slip-up. -- Commdor {Talk} 15:49, 10 May 2009 (UTC)

It is now Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 ( http://news.zergwatch.com/2009/05/18/activision-its-call-of-duty-modern-warfare-2/ ) Ice (talk) 23:47, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

That's from the Dutch division of Activision, and I've never heard of the game site itself, so the reliability is questionable. I'd wait for an official press release from the American branch or Infinity Ward themselves. We can't keep moving the article every instant someone claims out of the blue that it's such-and-such 2. -- Commdor {Talk} 00:00, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

These source says it's called "Modern Warfare 2" - http://360.kombo.com/article.php?artid=16873, http://kotaku.com/5315981/infinity-ward-talks-modern-warfare-2-43-stories-up--Shadyaftrmathgunit (talk) 11:56, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Yes, title

I know there was some discussion about it earlier, but it's unclear to me. Is it Modern Warfare 2? If so, should it be in a Call of Duty template shown at the end of the article? Mallerd (talk) 18:54, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Oh, [1] nevermind. Other question still stands, though. Mallerd (talk) 18:55, 5 June 2009 (UTC)

Infinity Ward needs to make up their gorram minds. THat being said, I think this box-art is enough, whether it was release on twitter or not. http://www.joystiq.com/2009/07/09/modern-warfare-2-box-art-includes-call-of-duty/ Note also four-zero-two is an IW employee. –xeno^talk 20:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I dunno, I'd like an official confirmation from IW - the boxart really looks hacked together - the "Call of Duty" doesn't fit at all (I thought it'd been Photoshopped at first). Thanks! Fin©™ 21:19, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Sure. We can wait, there's no deadline. Hopefully Joystiq has success getting a firm answer. –xeno^talk 21:23, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I've added that the box art was revealed in the Marketing section based off of the Twitter. I won't touch the official page title until we get formal confirmation from IW, though. Fire (talk) 21:28, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Just because the "Call of Duty" logo is on the package doesn't necessarily mean that it's part of the official title. If we are going to continue mentioning the box art like this, perhaps we should also mention the OTX survey results on brand awareness of the game without "Call of Duty" in the title.[2] Dancter (talk) 23:01, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Although many of the blog sites are claiming that it's a name change, I think the fact that Activision's statement continues to refer to the game as Modern Warfare 2 is telling.[3] To answer Mallerd's second question, I think the company's statement supports keeping it listed in the series template. Dancter (talk) 23:21, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

I officially think Infinity Ward has no idea what to name the game. If the article keeps getting moved should move protection be sought until things are sorted out? I'm done with this article until the dust settles. -- Commdor {Talk} 00:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

• I've protected the article for a week. There's no need to move it back and forth while we debate about it. –xeno^talk 15:59, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

I like your idea of having both Modern Warfare and Call of Duty in the lead, otherwise I think we should just stick to one name in the article for the moment (Modern Warfare 2, as that's the way the article is now). Thanks! Fin©™ 16:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

CoD title re-added

[4]. --90.208.178.125 (talk) 23:06, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

The Call of Duty title has been confirmed to appear on the game's box, but in official material they're still calling the game Modern Warfare 2. Until a definite source clarifies whether or not the game has been renamed, don't change it. There's nothing to suggest the game is called anything other than Modern Warfare 2 at this stage. Kflester (talk) 16:13, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Other sources

http://news.google.co.uk/news?pz=1&ned=uk&hl=en&q=call+of+duty —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.42.237.99 (talk) 17:12, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Requested move [DEBATE FINISHED]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was not moved. 20:23, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

---

Modern Warfare 2 → Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2 — Correct name as seen in sources; [5], [6]. Shadyaftrmathgunit (talk) 16:32, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

See discussion above. The page shouldn't be moved again (or the title within the article changed) until we get a definite source. Thanks! Fin©™ 16:34, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

Speedy close: see above. Sceptre ^(talk) 00:47, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

The box art is taken by fourzerotwo, one of the Infinity Ward developers. This is not fake. The title is clearly "Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2". There should be NO MORE DISCUSSION ABOUT THIS. The game's title is clear. LuGiADude (talk) 02:06, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

Numerous online retail stores have changed the name from "Modern Warfare 2" to "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2" - See hmv.com, amazon.com, walmart.com,--Shadyaftrmathgunit (talk) 13:55, 11 July 2009 (UTC)

The name should be changed, as FourZeroTwo (IW Staff Member) has shown the box art that clearly shows: Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2. [7] AusBOX —Preceding undated comment added 03:58, 12 July 2009 (UTC).

As soon as an official source publishes a change, then of course change the name. Someone's post on twitter, even on an official account, is not good enough. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:13, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

What about all the news sources reporting on the change? ShadowUltra (talk) 17:16, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Anything non-speculative? –xeno^talk 18:25, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Despite what is on the box, Infinity Ward and Activision continue to refer to the game as Modern Warfare 2. Neither have explicitly confirmed a name change. I specifically cited Gamasutra because it did a better job at not jumping to conclusions. Dancter (talk) 20:40, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

http://www.edge-online.com/news/modern-warfare-2-retains-call-of-duty-branding ShadowUltra (talk) 23:07, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

The phrase "Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2" did not appear once in Activision's statement. Dancter (talk) 23:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Neither did any terms like "name," "change," or "new title." Also notice the packaging for the other editions of the game, like the Hardened Edition and Prestige Edition, shown right beside the standard edition package.[8] The Call of Duty brand is not present. Dancter (talk) 02:02, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Indeed. The only piece of merchandise with the Call of Duty branding anywhere on it is the standard game... the game disc doesn't have it, the Hardened Edition cover art doesn't have it, nor does the Prestige Edition. All throughout that video it's just being called "Modern Warfare 2", and the logo at the beginning also lacks the Call of Duty name. They probably just tagged the logo on the regular cover art for brand recognition's sake, the game is still just Modern Warfare 2. --99.128.246.74 (talk) 07:55, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

There hasn't been any response from advocates for a move for nearly three days. I am going ahead and removing the move request banners. Dancter (talk) 19:52, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

The hardend edition case only says Modern Warfare 2 but the regular case says Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2 and the disk only says Modern Warfare 2 for all of the disks as seen here[9]. The Movie Master 1 (talk) 02:28, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Possible ARG?

From what I've seen on the website, there might be a possibility of an Alternate reality game. Can someone try to confirm this?

no —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.178.246 (talk) 06:06, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

Game taking place in Rio de Janeiro?

There are rumours that the game will take place in Rio de Janeiro, as in the trailer, it's possible to see the Christ the Redeemer and a favela. Should this be added to the article? ShifterBr (talk) 06:07, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

No. Rumours should not be included. Thanks! Fin©™ 06:45, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

Game may be released on the Nintendo Wii?

There are websites and rumours saying that Infinity Ward has confirmed a release on the Nintendo Wii. Has this actualy been confirmed by Infinity Ward themselves? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.77.163.94 (talk) 20:23, 25 May 2009 (UTC)

Teaser Storyline

In the trailer we can clearly see some plot points (Russian terrorist attack on airport/civilian area). This isn't a rumor or speculation, it's directly from the trailer. Could we include some info on that in the Plot section? - Plastic Fish (talk) 14:12, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

How do we know that's an actual plot point? The teaser really didn't show anything big, and it's clear IW is still waiting for a better day to flood us with actual footage and game play. Anyway, I've seen loads of teasers where their content didn't reflect much of the game itself. That Ps3 teaser for Bioshock 2 is a good example, it's really abstract and in the background rather than giving an upfront experience of the game. I'm sure that the attack in the teaser might be referenced as a news point: resurgent Russian Ultranationalists doing terrorist strikes in America as revenge or something, one of the game's characters might mention it, like how Gaz and Capt. Price briefed the player about the Russian civil war at the beginning of COD4. Boiled down though, IW has given us a ton of nothing to stew over for the next few weeks. =/= Ironoclast (Talk) 19:28, 31 March 2009 (UTC)

I do not see any real connections to russians, their accents are ambiguous and he only says "Remember THE russian." —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.206.163 (talk) 10:08, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

No, actually he says "Remember, no Russian". But that's irrelevant now anyway I suppose. - Plastic Fish (talk) 16:59, 2 April 2009 (UTC)

Platforms

Seeing as how the teaser was released on the Xbox Live Marketplace and the Playstation Network, I think it is pretty safe to assume that this game will be on both the Xbox 360 and the PS3... as if we did not already know that. I believe we should put up the names of the consoles. Who agrees?Gamer93 (talk) 20:34, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree, but someone will probably object using a very strict interpretation of WP:V and WP:CRYSTAL. –xeno (talk) 21:06, 10 April 2009 (UTC)

I agree. What platforms will this game be on? I'll search the net for ya, and I'll give ya a bell asap. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 10:35, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Yep! Got a link from IGN[10] with all the ports of Modern Warfare 2, If anyone for any reason thinks my source is unreliable, please take it up on this talk page before you delete it. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 10:53, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Infinity Ward have not announced any platforms. IGN is speculating. Thanks! Fin©™ 11:58, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

How can you asume that? Fair enough IGN classes the Wii port as 'rumored' but all the other ports are not rumored, and even have box art. Are you sure, or do you have a credible source to say IGN are specualating? mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:02, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

Infinity Ward/Activision have not announced any platforms (though 360, PS3 and PC would be a fair guess). Unless you can provide a news article quoting either Activision or IW, stating the platforms, then it's speculation. Thanks! Fin©™ 17:27, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

A search page is not an appropriate source. The databases of gaming websites are often speculative, error-prone and/or out-of-date. This sort of information should be attributed to something like an article or press release. Dancter (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I think that based on comments by Infinity Ward's Director of Communications, the existence of the Xbox 360 and PlayStation 3 versions can be considered unofficially confirmed. http://www.fourzerotwo.com/2009/04/04/rumor-smash-fake-iw-quote/ Dancter (talk) 17:39, 20 April 2009 (UTC)

I myself can not think of a source anymore relyiable then a search page, but suit yourself. All I'm saying is that it won't be long until the wiki mods are on everyone's case editing this page to oblivion. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 18:18, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

That goes a long way to explaining things like why you couldn't figure out that the Xbox 540 report was bunk, and that there is no Dreamcast 2. Dancter (talk) 19:31, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

Em... Yeah... Dancter kinda hit the nail on the head there. The most reliable source is one quoting the publisher or developer - essentially you want this story, but for MW2. Thanks! Fin©™ 22:16, 21 April 2009 (UTC)

The most important thing is that the infomation on wikipedia is sourced, and I always source the infomation I give on wikipedia. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 15:35, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

No, the most important thing is that the information on wikipedia is reliably sourced. Have a read of WP:RS. Thanks! Fin©™ 18:48, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Ok, well in that case, I have never known IGN as being a unreliable source. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 16:49, 23 April 2009 (UTC)

No joy wether or not IGN is a reliable source? Well as soon as anyone's got any joy, give us a bell asap. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

IGN is a reliable source for news, not for platforms or release dates before they're announced. Thanks! Fin©™ 16:48, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Ok then. I guess you're right, but it'dd say it is farly reliable, but not enough for wikipedia's standards. mcjakeqcool Mcjakeqcool (talk) 17:25, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

game add-ons

I haven't been here for awhile, so my question is this. Should we and are we aloud to add anything we have read that was stated in legitimate magazines such as GameInfromer. Because I read that the game will feature customizable online characters and the ability to use the xbox 360s cam to paste your face on the character?Flynn M Taggart (talk) 10:12, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes, you can cite some print sources; in fact, the Game Informer issue with the Modern Warfare 2 preview is already cited in parts of the article. I don't know what you're talking about when you refer to the online multiplayer, though. The issue has practically nothing about online, saying only that the devs are keeping it under wraps for now, and there was no mention of console cameras at all. -- Commdor {Talk} 19:29, 20 May 2009 (UTC)

Cover Art

The unofficial cover art at the bottom of the page is useless; I think it should be removed. --90.220.24.211 (talk) 17:10, 26 May 2009 (UTC)

Non-combatants

A first for CoD? Yes/No? GI seemed to feature them as obsticals not to shoot at, but can anyone confirm this? --Zero Serenity (talk) 06:03, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

The trailer pretty much does. 'The Ninjalemming'' 15:58, 31 May 2009 (UTC)

There was a hostage on the 'mile high club' level in COD4. Is that what you mean by non-combatants? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.89.98.118 (talk) 17:05, 18 June 2009 (UTC)

Gary "Roach" Sanderson

In Infinity Ward's demo in E3 (accessible from IGN's website), the much hyped mountain climbing level can be seen to take place in the Tian Shan Range in Kazakhstan, with the name of the playable character being Sergeant Gary "Roach" Sanderson. Shall we include this?? Ken l lee (talk) 05:23, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

DLC exclusive to the Xbox 360?

The E3 press conference merely stated that the DLC would come out first on the 360, not that it would be exclusive. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 129.234.227.124 (talk) 14:16, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

It's to come out first for xbox 360 then ps3 he never said they were exclusive to the xbox 360 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.45.127.120 (talk) 18:55, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

That's not what the current source says, and I have yet to find anything that says otherwise. If you can supply an appropriate source that backs this up, then we can see about updating/correcting the article. -- Commdor {Talk} 19:19, 3 June 2009 (UTC)

My Sources

I edited two sections on MW2: The release date, and the Consoles it will come out on I couldn't get to your refrences, so here is the place where I got my info: http://xbox360.ign.com/objects/142/14281102.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by Calebcass1 (talk • contribs) 17:12, 2 June 2009 (UTC)

Release Date

The current release date is set at November 10, 2009, is it worth mentioning that this is the Marine Corps birthday, and could be coincidental due to the game being Marine Corps culture-heavy? —Preceding unsigned comment added by USMCSoftLove (talk • contribs) 08:59, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

Until a reliable source mentions the tie in it is original research. Dbrodbeck (talk) 12:09, 10 June 2009 (UTC)

The date may be picked due to the mm/dd/yy format, as it will be "09.10.11." as evidenced in the trailer. --Kelvin_HO^{Wiknerd(talk)} 11:53, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Except that would be yy/dd/mm format Daeth (talk) 12:33, 26 June 2009 (UTC)

Which, of course, no civilized nation on the planet uses. –xeno^talk 18:43, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

THe release date is 11/10/09 (as seen in all the trailers for CoD:MW2) so shouldnt the release date on the MW2 page say "11 October 2009"? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 41.245.182.162 (talk) 18:39, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

IW is in the U.S., so I would gather they are using MM/DD/YY. –xeno^talk 18:41, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Official Game Cover Art Released

As a result the current image which is being depicted should be changed immediately. Also this includes the articles name.

http://modernwarfare2.net/http://modernwarfare2.net/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/mw2-game-case-box-art.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.74.186.199 (talk) 10:42, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

I know activision is trying to create a new series away from the main CoD line but because there was a recent survey suggesting more people would buy the game if it had the CoD title added to it they added it on. They are trying to do everything to get the game detached from it but maybe next time so for now I think the game art and at least the new title need recognition.—Preceding unsigned comment added by Shane3x (talk • contribs) 05:52, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

[DUCKLOL123] To add, I have uploaded the same picture many times but it has been declined

That image is not appropriate for use in this article. It is a second-hand picture of someone holding multiple copies of the box, not the cover art itself. Once suitable cover art images are available, the article will be updated. -- Commdor {Talk} 01:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Collectors edition

I've seen in this video, that there's going to be a collectors edition. Anything known about that already? Mallerd (talk) 21:24, 15 June 2009 (UTC)

add new box art

Add the new box art.... —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.225.31.54 (talk) 06:31, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

It has been done, if anyone can find a higher quality resolution image could they please update it thanks? Avoid going back to the pre-reveal art please as we aren't babies, it's official what the actual art is now. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 202.74.186.199 (talk) 05:55, 15 July 2009 (UTC)

Should i add a list of weapons confirmed for singleplayer

I added a list of weapons confirmed for singleplayer but someone deleted it

16/7/09

http://modernwarfare247.com/singleplayer/weapons

Hi. I deleted it per WP:GAMECRUFT. Thanks! Fin©™ 08:25, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

I uploaded the confirmed box art

Hey everybody i have uploaded the box art here at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:MW2_box_art_final_edition.JPG and calm down i know it isn't the best quality but at least its the real one. —Preceding unsigned comment added by KAPITALIST88 (talk • contribs) 08:23, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

don't think that was legit, the call of duty title looks like its been hastily slapped on, plus it just seems a little sparse and unfinished to me —Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.107.178.246 (talk) 05:49, 21 July 2009 (UTC)

here is the box art

http://pic40.picturetrail.com/VOL278/10103886/20795363/367192396.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by KAPITALIST88 (talk • contribs) 10:19, 20 July 2009 (UTC)

There's more to it than just that, like the Call of Duty logo and destroyed Washington backdrop. DancingCyberman (talk) 18:45, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Thats the actual box art for the game

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SpiH8q64Spk —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.37.223.57 (talk) 23:53, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

Plot

I have seen some wrong information, it says that it was set several years after COD 4, but in an E3 interview (gamespot website) FOURZEROTWO said it took place straight after COD4

I'm sure he meant that MW2 was a direct sequel to CoD4, in that sense the game does take place "straight after" CoD4. The sentence in the article that says the game takes place several years later is sourced; the timing was mentioned in the Game Informer issue that previewed MW2. -- Commdor {Talk} 01:17, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

multiplayer

ac 130s

resolution

will be in 1024 * 600

http://www.gamezine.co.uk/news/games/c/call-duty-modern-warfare-2/modern-warfare-2-render-at-600p-$1314777.htm —Preceding unsigned comment added by 144.162.117.7 (talk) 23:01, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

Reception section

one should be started to note the early reception from publishers delaying many games out of the Q4 2009 release window because of MW2's release. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.177.182.57 (talk) 02:34, 31 July 2009 (UTC)