Talk:Muhibullah Allahabadi

This article was nominated for deletion on 8 November 2014. The result of the discussion was keep.

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles

India: History Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Indian history workgroup (assessed as Low-importance).

Contested deletion

This article should not be speedily deleted for lack of asserted importance because... (There is at least one good source) --Why should I have a User Name? (talk) 09:23, 8 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed name change

"Shaikh" and "Shah" are both honorifics, which violates the WP:HONORIFIC guideline. The article should just be titled "Muhibullah Allahabadi." MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:34, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I just moved the page. The guideline is clear, so this does not seem controversial. Aymatth2 (talk) 14:23, 11 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Protected page

I've semi'd the page for 24 hours since there has been an IP adding and re-adding unsourced, non-neutral, and copyvio material to the page. I know that this is still at AfD and that's why it's only for a day, but I do have to warn any incoming users that unsourced material can and will be removed if it is non-neutral, redundant, or could be considered a violation of WP:BLP. I'd prefer that any discussion take place on this talk page before any serious changes get made, as this article is still at AfD and while it looks likely that it will be kept, some of the changes could jeopardize the AfD. (IE, if it comes across as spammy.) Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 05:01, 14 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem removed

Prior content in this article duplicated one or more previously published sources. The material was copied from: https://vdocuments.mx/document/sufi-thought-of-muhibbullah-6923pdf-the-author-of-the-following-works-tarjamatul.html. Copied or closely paraphrased material has been rewritten or removed and must not be restored, unless it is duly released under a compatible license. (For more information, please see "using copyrighted works from others" if you are not the copyright holder of this material, or "donating copyrighted materials" if you are.)

For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or published material; such additions will be deleted. Contributors may use copyrighted publications as a source of information, and, if allowed under fair use, may copy sentences and phrases, provided they are included in quotation marks and referenced properly. The material may also be rewritten, providing it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Therefore, such paraphrased portions must provide their source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with these policies. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:26, 29 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"QutubeAllahabad" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect QutubeAllahabad. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 9#QutubeAllahabad until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Zoodino (talk) 06:00, 9 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Removing QutubeAllahabad as another name

I have removed QutubeAllahabad as an another name from the article here, due to lack of any reliable reference. I will also be relisting the redirect QutubeAllahabad for deletion, for the same reason. Zoodino (talk) 07:10, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"QutubeAllahabad" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect QutubeAllahabad. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 27#QutubeAllahabad until a consensus is reached, and readers of this page are welcome to contribute to the discussion. Zoodino (talk) 07:19, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]