While the biographies of living persons policy does not apply directly to the subject of this article, it may contain material that relates to living persons, such as friends and family of persons no longer living, or living persons involved in the subject matter. Unsourced or poorly sourced contentious material about living persons must be removed immediately. If such material is re-inserted repeatedly, or if there are other concerns related to this policy, please see this noticeboard.
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Crime and Criminal Biography, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Crime and Criminal Biography articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Crime and Criminal BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Crime and Criminal BiographyCrime-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Death, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Death on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.DeathWikipedia:WikiProject DeathTemplate:WikiProject DeathDeath
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of International relations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.International relationsWikipedia:WikiProject International relationsTemplate:WikiProject International relationsInternational relations
This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Ukraine, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Ukraine on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.UkraineWikipedia:WikiProject UkraineTemplate:WikiProject UkraineUkraine
The contentious topics procedure applies to this page. This page is related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, which has been designated as a contentious topic.
I don't have any intensive opinions about this topic, but as far as I understand good scholarship, articles referring to the subject matter being studied referring to it with adjectives like "evil" tend to set themselves below the standards of impartiality and given the deluge of interest in this subject by the Anglophonic mass media, there are certainly sources that at least aren't so obviously biased as to make that bias evident in the source's title.
This is not to say biased sources, or seemingly biased sources, can't be sources that those of more detached and sober perspective cannot gain insight from, but given that this is a topic listed as contentious, someone involved in the account of this particular subject should probably find some alternatives that rub those seeking cursory knowledge about the topic as a little more impartial than "Evil Wagner Group..." This would be just as inappropriate as Western periodicals calling the Islamic State evil, as well as such being as potentially inhibitory to the understanding of those interested in the sort of overview and list of generally significantly better sources from which one can continue to research that Wikipedia typically provides even in these sorts of divisive and evolving contexts.
Again, I am not interested enough in the topic to spend the precious moments of my finite life finding sources that seem at a glance less glaringly biased, rhetorical and one-sided as those this article uses to cite its information that does seem more impartial than its sources (to be totally fair), but think it would serve the community best were someone with more expertise and interest to do so. ThomasLeonHighbaugh (talk) 09:35, 25 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]
The standard for sourcing on Wikipedia is reliability, not impartiality or lack of bias. Bias sources can certainly be reliable, and the view that Wagner (or ISIS for that matter) are "evil" is hardly a fringe opinion, it's the mainstream view worldwide. In any event, "I don't like what the source says" isn't a reason we modify sourcing on our articles, especially not when the complainant is unwilling to put in the legwork to improve the article themselves. Also FarHarBard, it's probably unnecessary to reply to a comment from over a year ago, to a user who has made zero article-space edits and less than 10 in total their whole career. ⇒SWATJesterShoot Blues, Tell VileRat!16:01, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg)
