This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Japan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Japan-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. Current time in Japan: 22:50, September 23, 2017 (JST, Heisei 29) (Refresh)
In what sense is the Shiomibashi-sen part of the Koya-sen? As it heads into Osaka to the west of the main line, while the Koya-sen goes to the southeast, it is closer to being a part of the honsen - but I wouldn't list it as part of either. Dekimasuよ! 14:55, 29 May 2007 (UTC)
Shiomibashi-line is the historical origin of the Koya-line and still the origin in official documents. In the past, trains from Gokurakubashi was going to Shiomibashi, until 1929 ( according to Japanese version ). After 1929, not trains are passing through Shiomibashi and Koya-lines. Yuryu (talk) 18:14, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
The color of rapid express is the same to limited express, but it is actually similar to express rather than to limited express. For example, only LE requires additional fee unlike to Ex and RE. LE has two special names "Koya", which runs to Gokurakubashi and "Rinkan", to Hashimoto, both from Namba station. I don't know how to change the colors in the Station section of the article. could someone edit it please? Yuryu (talk) 18:19, 30 August 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, I do understand what you want, but removed colours of the table. Colouring is not welcomed in ENWP. Maxima m (talk) 09:44, 4 September 2008 (UTC)
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: Moved — Amakuru (talk) 15:02, 12 September 2016 (UTC)
– The Nankai Electric Railway never put the suffix "Nankai" to its rail lines including Koya Line, and the naming of these lines is unique enough even after removing the suffix. Besides, there is no need for putting the suffix to disambiguate other pages since those listed page are all redirected from the target pages to move. Thanks. KU (talk) 04:07, 4 September 2016 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.