Talk:Nea Salamis Famagusta FC

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured article candidateNea Salamis Famagusta FC is a former featured article candidate. Please view the links under Article milestones below to see why the nomination failed. For older candidates, please check the archive.
Good articleNea Salamis Famagusta FC has been listed as one of the Sports and recreation good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
April 11, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
July 8, 2013Peer reviewReviewed
August 23, 2013Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 18, 2013Good article nomineeListed
Current status: Former featured article candidate, current good article


GA Review[edit]

This review is transcluded from Talk:Nea Salamis Famagusta FC/GA2. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Royroydeb (talk · contribs) 16:54, 3 October 2013 (UTC) This article has serious reference issues.I have put the [citation needed] tag in places which you are to improve.Also provide references for "Statistics by opponents" , "Nea Salamia in Cypriot Cup" and "Since 2010".In the honours what is the women's team honour doing?it is correct to give a little info about the women's team but need not provide the womens' team honour.Hope you will improve.RRD13 (talk) 16:54, 3 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The only problem is the about "Statistics by opponents" , "Nea Salamia in Cypriot Cup". Untill 1998 there is a book that have all the completed statistics. Since then I add the other seasons untill today, using sourse like Cyprus Football Association and RSSSF. Is that allowed? What you suggest? (For some statistics i can find internet sources untill 2010 or 2011 but not for all). Xaris333 (talk) 17:42, 6 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Provide the sources that you have.In the current squad there are many vice captains which is not the way to write.One is (vice-captain) others are (2nd vice-captain), (3rd vice-captain0 and so on.And please delink those red links.And references for Former Managers and anthem?Also to work on Famagusta municipal stadium last sentence.RRD13 (talk) 03:43, 7 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done. What's next? Xaris333 (talk) 19:40, 8 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Cypriot Second Division performance in 1953-54....2003-04 lacks references.Also Class A statistics.The anthem should be in italics(as in RCD Mallorca) or in quotes(West Ham United F.C.).RRD13 (talk) 04:26, 9 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

  • Cypriot Second Division  Done
  • anthem  Done
  • Class A statistics: is the sum of the statistics in Cypriot First Division. For each period or decade there are sources in previous tables. Should i put them again under this table? Xaris333 (talk) 00:49, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Yes of course!Otherwise there might be confusion.RRD13 (talk) 14:23, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Done! Xaris333 (talk) 19:29, 13 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • The pictures miss caption.Please add them.Also add current season.RRD13 (talk) 13:53, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Current season: done (i add the article of the leaque, there is no article fot team's current season). You mean tha pictures of fans at the end? (the others have captio) What i should write? Are Nea Salamina Famagusta Fans at Ammochostos Stadium in all the pictures. Xaris333 (talk) 20:36, 16 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes caption at the pictures at Gallery.For example "Fans at a match against Doxa","The fans at xy cup final","The fans i 2009 "etc.Can you give the references for the captains?RRD13 (talk) 06:32, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Both done. Xaris333 (talk) 14:20, 17 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Making some improvements,then I will pass it.RRD13 (talk) 08:42, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1. Well written?:

Prose quality:
Manual of Style compliance:

2. Factually accurate and verifiable?:

References to sources:
Citations to reliable sources, where required:
No original research:

3. Broad in coverage?:

Major aspects:
Focused:

4. Reflects a neutral point of view?:

Fair representation without bias:

5. Reasonably stable?

No edit wars, etc. (Vandalism does not count against GA):

6. Illustrated by images, when possible and appropriate?:

Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:


Overall:

Pass or Fail: . RRD13 (talk) 08:45, 18 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]