Talk:Olivia Hack

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject Biography / Arts and Entertainment (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
Taskforce icon
This article is supported by the arts and entertainment work group.
 
WikiProject Women (Rated Stub-class)
WikiProject icon This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
Stub-Class article Stub  This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale.
 

Move?[edit]

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the proposal was Withdrawing the flub proposal I ever made, as zzyzx11 explain it very well. George Ho (talk) 21:36, 29 April 2012 (UTC)


Olivia HackActing career of Olivia HackWP:articles for deletion/Olivia Hack proves that Olivia Hack fails general notability guidelines but meets other guidelines. WP:article titles may generally prefer names of people to "<something> of a person"; in some cases, Tyler Clementi is redirected to Suicide of Tyler Clementi because of notability concerns. In this case, no reliable sources that could cover this person's life are found at this time other than articles about her performance in works, such as The Brady Bunch movies, and her birthday. Must we always use mere names for biography of the person, or must we go for "Career of <person's name>" for the sake of respecting WP:BLP and a person's private life? --George Ho (talk) 03:34, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

  • Send for deletion If this person does not meet GNG, nothing else here meets GNG from its current appearance either. How does the acting career meet GNG? Unlinke "Suicide of X", this article shows nothing about the career that meets GNG. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 05:08, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
    • What about Olivia Hack filmography then? Well, according to AFD, her career could meet WP:V, WP:ANYBIO, and/or WP:NACTOR. Last time I nominated this for deletion, the discussion closed as "no consensus" of "whether failure to meet WP:GNG should not compel deletion". Want me to explain more how the AFD went? --George Ho (talk) 05:40, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
  • please withdraw this RM Passed an AfD, just, no need for this proposal - which I'm sorry, is ridiculous. In ictu oculi (talk) 05:52, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
  • Oppose. Tyler Clementi, a person who is primary known for a WP:BIO1E, is one thing. But for someone who qualifies under WP:ANYBIO, WP:NACTOR, and WP:V for their long, over two-decade career? No. A concise article title is sufficient. "<something> of a person" should primarily be used for WP:BIO1E articles (which is explained in that last paragraph of that guideline). I do not see any other guideline that specifically states that a person who only meets WP:ANYBIO and WP:NACTOR, but not WP:GNG, automatically disqualifies it from the concise article title. Zzyzx11 (talk) 21:16, 29 April 2012 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.