Talk:Oneida language

Indigenous peoples of North America High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North America, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Native Americans, Indigenous peoples in Canada, and related indigenous peoples of North America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Indigenous peoples of North AmericaWikipedia:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaTemplate:WikiProject Indigenous peoples of North AmericaIndigenous peoples of North America articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Endangered languages (inactive)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Endangered languages, a project which is currently considered to be inactive.Endangered languagesWikipedia:WikiProject Endangered languagesTemplate:WikiProject Endangered languagesEndangered languages articles

Languages Low‑importance

	Language portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Languages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of languages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LanguagesWikipedia:WikiProject LanguagesTemplate:WikiProject Languageslanguage articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Anthropology: Oral tradition

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
	This article is supported by Oral tradition taskforce.

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Crwalter.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 8 September 2020 and 18 December 2020. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Azavitz4.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 01:52, 18 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment

This article is or was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Nacchan b.

Above undated message substituted from Template:Dashboard.wikiedu.org assignment by PrimeBOT (talk) 05:41, 17 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No labials?

Is it really possible that this language entirely lacks labials (even m)?

Yes, there are several more like that in North America. [m] is reportedly considered baby-talk in some or all of them. – Note, however, that [w] is there. David Marjanović 20:55, 19 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Also, note that Iroquois languages have nasal vowels which tend to have a near -n or near-m sound depending upon how much the speaker closes the mouth to resonate. In addition there are a few borrowed words from English or French that have stuck at least in Mohawk and the Labials , mostly M's, will be spoken but as a borrowed word. it's rare to hear someone then build into that word, more Mohawk informational units. I studied Mohawk, one of Oneida's closest cousins according to Lounsberry and Mithun, and it never struck me as odd. Speakers of Indo-European Langauges and especially of modern European languages expect a greater array of distinctly listed "consonants" to appear in Iroquoian langauges when in fact, they have a more complex grammar and informational encoding system than those of the Old World. These are Polysynthetic languages and a huge amount of data is built into each utterance. For example, a simple utterance can tell you both how many of something, what state of action those things are in, where they are and so forth. Don't get me started on the large number of pronominal distinctions ! Another feature that makes the languages richer are specific consonant clusters that obey certain rules based on whether one voices them or not. The consonant clusters behave almost as extra consonants. When they are voiced, we hear them but if the rule is to not to voice them, the speaker will still form them with the mouth and simply not voice them. I'm rather sad that after my class of Linguists came up through Graduate and post-grad work, most of us could not find grants or mentors to continue work in these areas and so we drifted to "sexier" areas of Linguistics or Anthropology. BTW, I would suggest reading the article on Mohawk language, which I feel is less dense and far less dated. It might give you a better understand about the consonant cluster issue. LiPollis (talk) 01:53, 13 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Number of speakers

The body of the article says that there are 160 native speakers. The sidebar says there are 250 speakers total. Are there 90 non-native speakers, or is there an error in one of the numbers? 206.148.108.219 17:22, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

LA Times Article

I found the link to the article: http://articles.latimes.com/print/2008/feb/03/books/bk-treuer3 . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.120.184.122 (talk) 02:45, 25 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Oneida language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20090117220456/http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/months/october/Iroquoian.html to http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/months/october/Iroquoian.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:13, 9 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Oneida language. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090117220456/http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/months/october/Iroquoian.html to http://www.nvtc.gov/lotw/months/october/Iroquoian.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:45, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]