Editors are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction when reverting logged-in users on all pages related to the Syrian Civil War and the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant, broadly construed. When in doubt, assume it is related, and don't revert.
Please see here for more information. Editors who violate this restriction may be blocked or otherwise sanctioned without warning by any uninvolved administrator, even on a first offence.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Iraq, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Iraq on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Syria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Syria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This template is within the scope of WikiProject Terrorism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles on terrorism, individual terrorists, incidents and related subjects on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.
This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
Was Cpl. Nathan Cirillo a casualty of Operation Impact?[edit]
And as such, should he be listed in the infobox?
I am of the opinion that he was, but I thought that the may be contentious and I wanted to take the temperature here first. Juno (talk) 12:37, 31 October 2014 (UTC)
Indirectly, since Bibeau never directly claimed that he was killing because of Operation Impact, it would only be supposition.Llammakey (talk) 10:28, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Is there any problem with taking off the additional citations tag at the top of the article at this point? Llammakey (talk) 10:28, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Well it`s been six days, I`m just going to go ahead and do it. If it needs to be, it can be put back later. Llammakey (talk) 19:12, 27 January 2015 (UTC)