Jump to content

Talk:Otto Julius Zobel

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Featured articleOtto Julius Zobel is a featured article; it (or a previous version of it) has been identified as one of the best articles produced by the Wikipedia community. Even so, if you can update or improve it, please do so.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on January 28, 2012.
Did You Know Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 8, 2008Good article nomineeListed
August 12, 2009Featured article candidateNot promoted
October 3, 2009Featured article candidatePromoted
Did You Know A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on April 18, 2008.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ...that AT&T engineer Otto Zobel helped to establish that electronic noise cannot be completely eliminated from radio and cable transmissions?
Current status: Featured article

Can noise be cancelled?

[edit]

I disagree with changing this sub-heading to "noise cancellation". This implies that Zobel and Carson were working on this, they were not, there work shows the exact opposite, that such a thing is impossible and those attempting it were misguided. Although in general I would agree that a question as title is poor style, I feel this is one of those rare exceptions where it exactly encapsulates the situation. SpinningSpark 17:39, 19 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

See also section

[edit]

Some of the entries in the "see also" section were recently deleted on the grounds that they are already linked. I feel that in an article of this length it is useful for the reader to have all the relevant circuits grouped together and linked to their articles for easy reference. Likewise with the key people involved. I know what it says at WP:ALSO, but it also says that it is ultimately a matter of editorial judgment. I think you will find that virtually all the entries in "see also" are already linked. The section should, therefore, be allowed to stand or deleted in its entirety. Piecemeal removals is just going to make a mess of it. SpinningSpark 14:14, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, so let's get rid of it entirely. I was merely removing links I had recalled seeing. This article is nowhere near long enough to justify such an extensive see also section, especially since most of the terms are already linked. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 14:16, 15 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
OK, agreed. SpinningSpark 09:20, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Well, not entirely. Just stuff that's already linked. —Anonymous DissidentTalk 10:25, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Nah, take them all out - lattice phase equaliser and the Heaviside condition are already linked. Bandstop filter was only there for completeness because the others were, although Zobel certainly provided some designs, the article will not throw any additional light on this one. SpinningSpark 17:55, 16 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Design engineer?

[edit]

What is a design engineer? Is it an engineer who designs things? That's pretty much every engineer. This guy sounds like an electrical engineer and the article should say that instead of the ambiguous term, "design engineer." (WP Editor 2011 (talk) 10:58, 28 January 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Agreed. SpinningSpark 16:41, 28 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Engineers are sometimes divided into "design engineers" and "production engineers". One designs things -- prototypes if you will. The other makes them manufacturable and manages production. Some other common functions would include quality engineer and so on. ☆ Bri (talk) 00:01, 26 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Otto Julius Zobel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:21, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Otto Julius Zobel. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:55, 13 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

FA in need of review

[edit]

I started to record this article for WP:SPOKEN but kept running into oddities and irregularities in the prose. Without having fact-checked the article, the biggest issue to me is one of WP:TONE. I find this article generally to be too informal and read almost more as an essay in places than an encyclopedia article. Some specific instances of this:

  • Thus, they anticipated the later work of Claude Shannon, who showed how the theoretical information rate of a channel is related to the noise of the channel. -- Feels like WP:OR
  • The last of Zobel's prolific list of patents -- Feels WP:PEACOCK
  • It is therefore no surprise that in Zobel's paper on the electric wave filter a very similar representation is found for the transmission function of filters. -- definitely editorializing
  • With modern technology such a calculation is trivially easy, but Ingersoll and Zobel recommend the use of harmonic analysers, which are the mechanical counterpart of today's spectrum analysers. -- Again, a WP:TONE issue.

These issues are present throughout the article. I suspect there are also places additional (or more specific, to include page numbers) citations should be added, especially in the sections discussing Zobel's research. These issues should be rectified if the article is to retain FA status. M4V3R1CK32 (talk) 22:49, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]