Jump to content

Talk:PAGASA

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Requested move 2 August 2015

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: Not moved. No support for moving. (non-admin closure) Natg 19 (talk) 06:45, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


PAGASAPhilippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration – This is the full title of the organization, which the acronym PAGASA stands for. According to the history,[1] it was moved from the longer title to its current one because "no one likes how long it is". Frankly, not liking something is not relevant to why MOS:ABBR was written. I feel that this page belongs at the longer title, keeping in mind that this is still an encyclopedia. Or that at least a discussion is necessary to obtain other editors' opinions on the matter. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 08:05, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can i ask why should WP:ABBR override WP:Common Name? The name PAGASA is used a lot more than the Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration, in fact per a very quick Google News search PAGASA is used 41000 times and the full title 4000 times. As a result I oppose moving it back to Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration.Jason Rees (talk) 10:08, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
WP:COMMONNAME mostly refers to 's-Gravenhage being at The Hague because it is used more commonly (in English) than the other not because it is an abbreviation. Also, keep in mind that in the sources it is referred to as "Philippine Atmospheric, Geophysical and Astronomical Services Administration (PAGASA)" at least once and not just "PAGASA".Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 05:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • I thought it should have the shortened title for the same reason as NASA has the shortened title. They're both acronyms that are pronounced as written. There is nothing wrong with writing it out here and having a redirect, but I feel given the acronym is more used, we do our readers a favor having it shortened. Hurricanehink mobile (talk) 13:16, 2 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Department of Education (Philippines), Philippine Institute of Volcanology and Seismology and Commission on Elections (Philippines) are also commonly referred to as DepEd, PHIVOLCS and COMELEC, respectively; and yet they rather belong there at the full title for obvious encyclopedic reasons eventhough those abbreviations are "commonly" used. Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 05:59, 3 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
Comment. @58.176.246.42: Yes, and if the ratio between those search results wasn't 1:14 (unlike 1:511 for NASA and 1:177 for FIFA) you'd have a point. WP:CONCISE rather applies to Democratic People's Republic of Korea being at North Korea. Also, I sincerely doubt that readers will only be able "recognize the name by its acronym".Raykyogrou0 (Talk) 13:05, 5 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose as per WP:COMMONNAME and WP:ACRONYMTITLE. I see that the DepEd, PHIVOLCS and COMELEC examples were used above as a "counter". Of the three, many people arguably know what "DepEd" and "COMELEC" means, while the maning of "PHIVOLCS", like "PAGASA", is best reserved to trivia, seismology and weather buffs. It works in DepEd's and COMELEC's favor that the meanings of those two are composed of three words each, instead of PHIVOLCS and PAGASA where each letter stands for a word. (With that being said I'd be in favor of the article about PHIVOLCS being moved to that name.) See also: Meralco and EDSA (road). –HTD 22:08, 9 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]
  • Oppose. -Shhhhwwww!! (talk) 06:25, 10 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on PAGASA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 19:40, 1 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on PAGASA. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 07:06, 11 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

basyang 2018

[edit]

typhoon basyang 2018? pls help phnews.wikia.com — Preceding unsigned comment added by 122.52.64.241 (talk) 03:40, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]


[edit]

This article has been revised as part of a large-scale clean-up project of multiple article copyright infringement. (See the investigation subpage) Earlier text must not be restored, unless it can be verified to be free of infringement. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions must be deleted. Contributors may use sources as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences or phrases. Accordingly, the material may be rewritten, but only if it does not infringe on the copyright of the original or plagiarize from that source. Please see our guideline on non-free text for how to properly implement limited quotations of copyrighted text. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously. Sennecaster (What now?) 17:29, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Ap

[edit]

Love 49.147.187.241 (talk) 07:04, 1 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Wat does PAGASA mean

[edit]

in filipino 2001:4451:32C:9500:40ED:5426:CCAC:3F50 (talk) 09:19, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Pangasiwaan ng Pilipinas sa Serbisyong Atmosperiko, Heopisiko at Astronomiko Ned1a Wanna talk? 22:36, 28 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]