Talk:Panzer Dragoon Mini
| This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Panzer Dragoon Mini article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
| Find video game sources: "Panzer Dragoon Mini" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
 | Panzer Dragoon Mini has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. | ||||||||||||
 | Panzer Dragoon Mini is part of the Panzer Dragoon series series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so. | ||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||
| Current status: Good article | |||||||||||||
 | The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future: |
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Panzer Dragoon Mini/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: NegativeMP1 (talk · contribs) 21:21, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
I'll be reviewing this article. Since it's fairly short, I should have the review done either tonight or tomorrow. NegativeMP1 21:21, 15 November 2023 (UTC)
Aaaand that turned out to be false. Whoops. Anyways, here's the review now. Not doing a checklist because probably not necessary for an article as short as this.
General comments
[edit]- There are no cleanup banners.
- No signs of copyright violations.
- No edit warring.
- No previous GA reviews to take into account.
Review
[edit]- For writing, I didn't notice too many issues, but:
- Link "difficulty levels" to Game difficulty.
- Change "Its late 1996 release, near the end of the Game Gear's lifespan, makes the game harder to find than earlier releases, a rare collector's item that commands high prices on the secondary collectible market." to something on the lines of "Its late 1996 release, near the end of the Game Gear's lifespan, makes the game harder to find than earlier releases. It is considered a rare collector's item that commands high prices on the secondary collectible market." for better reading.
- The Reception section could be considered repetition of "X said Y", but I think for a subject as obscure as this with the limited sources available, it's written well enough and shouldn't have to be changed.
- For sourcing, I am assuming good faith here since I can't speak Spanish or Japanese.
- Article I believe covers all coverage necessary for a subject such as this. It presents all coverage in an unbiased manner as well.
- Add a caption to the cover art and alternate text to the gameplay screenshot.
Final Comments
[edit]Yeah, I don't see many problems with this article that should stop it from becoming a GA besides the few minor things I pointed out. I'll put this on hold until the issues I pointed out are addressed, but they're fairly minor. NegativeMP1 23:20, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
Done -- @NegativeMP1:I did all the changes that you pointed out in your review comments. Is there anything else left? Roberth Martinez (talk) 23:44, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- That was quick, and no. Everything I pointed out was all that I noticed could hold it back from GA. I think this meets the point of passing, good job.
NegativeMP1 23:49, 18 November 2023 (UTC)
- That was quick, and no. Everything I pointed out was all that I noticed could hold it back from GA. I think this meets the point of passing, good job.