Talk:Piatra Neamț
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
Misc.
[edit]"the Princely Cathedral being built in 1497-1898" I think you meant 1498, but I wasn't sure enough to change it, and I couldn't find an Internet reference for it. Art LaPella 22:25, August 24, 2005 (UTC)
Was Petrodava a town (or a village) or a fortress?
As far as I know, Dacians had no real urban culture an the word city is misused.--Luci_Sandor (talk, contribs) 19:25, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Teatrul.Tineretului.PN.jpg
[edit]Image:Teatrul.Tineretului.PN.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 07:28, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the move request was: page moved. Aervanath (talk) 01:14, 12 November 2011 (UTC)
ţ --> ț (the same rule for all Romanian city names) (Rgvis (talk) 15:05, 2 November 2011 (UTC))
- Support – always support correcting spelling errors. --Ohconfucius ¡digame! 01:57, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support need to fix spelling errorsMeatsgains (talk) 02:10, 4 November 2011 (UTC)
- Support. The use of t-cedilla (ţ) instead of the t-comma (ț) was due to technical limitations (see T-comma article for details). Now that those no longer exist, move to the correct spelling. If this request and related ones (here and here) are successful, I urge their application to all Romanian names. — AjaxSmack 01:37, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose. The t-comma does not render on XP without an add-on, and XP is the most widely used operating system for personal computers. Non-Romanians using more modern operating systems won't notice the difference. Isn't Romanian Wiki the place to show off the latest in Romanian diacritics? Kauffner (talk) 06:10, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Piatra Neamț. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20091116145101/http://www.piatra-neamt.net/en/twin_towns.php to http://www.piatra-neamt.net/en/twin_towns.php
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:03, 29 November 2017 (UTC)