Talk:Pierre Pagé

Requested move

The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: no consensus that sources prefer the unadorned "e". ErikHaugen (talk | contribs) 21:24, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

---

Pierre Pagé → Pierre Page –

• Support The use of "Pierre Page" is verified by the sources used within the article, and "Pierre Pagé" is not supported by the sources used as references for the article. Dolovis (talk) 03:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
• Comment The Globe and Mail and Toronto Star seem to also spell it as "Pierre Page". However Sports Illustrated [1][2] uses the accent. As does this French language Nordiques fansite [3], and this French language Quebec newspaper [4]. The New York Times uses an accent also [5].

So, it's definitely used in French, and sometimes used in English.

65.94.44.141 (talk) 14:18, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

• Support. Clearly the most common name in reliable English sources. A google news archive search shows 1170 hits for "Pierre Pagé", compared to a much greater 6250 hits for "Pierre Page". Jenks24 (talk) 09:00, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose Sports Illustrated and the New York Times uses the accent as do a number of others in english as well as french. In cases like this it is clearly spelled out that we should go with the diacritics. -DJSasso (talk) 12:09, 2 June 2011 (UTC)
• Support, per nom. GoodDay (talk) 11:21, 4 June 2011 (UTC)
• Oppose reliable sources use the accent. When the usage is split, I see no reason to make a change for change's sake. Canada Hky (talk) 20:08, 5 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Usage is not really "split". Five out of every six sources do not use the diacritic. I would agree with your point if the usage was 50/50, but that is the case in this discussion. Jenks24 (talk) 10:45, 6 June 2011 (UTC)
    • 50/50 would be evenly split, anything less than complete agreement is "split". Two high quality sources like SI and the NYT are more than enough to keep the status quo. Canada Hky (talk) 00:50, 7 June 2011 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Pierre Pagé. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/20071026223453/http://ecredbulls.seso.at/2006/team_detail.php?liga=2&id=263 to http://ecredbulls.seso.at/2006/team_detail.php?liga=2&id=263

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 17:06, 22 February 2016 (UTC)