This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Opera, a group writing and editing Wikipedia articles on operas, opera terminology, opera composers and librettists, singers, designers, directors and managers, companies and houses, publications and recordings. The project discussion page is a place to talk about issues and exchange ideas. New members are welcome!OperaWikipedia:WikiProject OperaTemplate:WikiProject OperaOpera articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject England, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of England on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.EnglandWikipedia:WikiProject EnglandTemplate:WikiProject EnglandEngland-related articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Correction and Detention Facilities, a project which is currently considered to be defunct.Correction and Detention FacilitiesWikipedia:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesTemplate:WikiProject Correction and Detention FacilitiesCorrection and Detention Facilities articles
From afc helpdesk preserve for future reference[edit]
10:39:14, 1 February 2019 review of submission by KatieGPO[edit]
Hi KatieGPO. Please clarify what you mean by "our". The policy on Wikipedia is "one user—one account". Usernames should not be shared by multiple individuals.
Your choice of username suggests you have a connection to Grange Park Opera (GPO), a sister concern of Pimlico Opera. Depending on the nature of that connection, you may have a conflict of interest when writing about Pimlico Opera. Editing with a conflict of interest is strongly discouraged. If you do so anyway, be transparent about it.
Creating a new encyclopedia article is one of the most difficult, time consuming, and frustrating endeavors a novice Wikipedian can attempt. Given that you have been unable to bring the draft into an acceptable state despite advice from five different reviewers, you don't appear to be prepared for the task. See WP:BFAQ#COMPANY for alternatives.
Attention reviewers(Chetsford—AngusWOOF—Atlantic306—KylieTastic—Bkissin): I agree with Chetsford's rejection comment that, "it's clear this is going nowhere", at least under the hand of the original author. However, searches turn up ample independent, reliable sources containing in-depth coverage of the organization's activities (some of which I've added to a "further reading" section). The topic meets WP:GNG and WP:NONPROFIT; Wikipedia should have an article about it. If no one has time to rewrite it, what do you think of stubbing the draft and kicking it into mainspace for independent development? --Worldbruce (talk) 16:46, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Stub it and promote. If the topic is a good topic it should be in mainspace. Legacypac (talk) 17:36, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
